His name is Yevhenii Petrovich Trush. He is 20 years old, fled the war in Ukraine, was studying chemistry at university, and has been forcibly disappeared since Venezuelan authorities detained him on October 20, 2024.
Yevhenii is missing, but not forgotten: the family waiting for him in Venezuela is tirelessly searching for him and demanding his release without delay. He had arrived in the country hoping to start a new life with his Venezuelan partner, after being forced to leave his home due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. His partner’s mother and family welcomed him as one of their own and waited for him with open arms. A year later, they are still waiting for him.
As is increasingly the case in Venezuela — a country where crimes against humanity have been committed since at least 2014 — authorities arbitrarily detain those they believe may serve a political purpose and then deny their detention, or conceal their fate and whereabouts. This is what international human rights law defines as a “forced disappearance,” and it can last for days, weeks, or, as in Yevhenii’s case, a year or more.
Yevhenii suffers from Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). On the day of his disappearance, he was attempting to seek asylum at the Atanasio Girardot International Bridge on the border with Colombia when he was intercepted by agents from the Administrative Service of Identification, Migration, and Foreigners (SAIME) and agents from the General Directorate of Military Counterintelligence (DGCIM). Nothing has been heard from him since.
According to his mother-in-law, since November 2, 2024, the family has been searching for Yevhenii at prisons where people are typically detained for political reasons, such as the headquarters of the DGCIM located in Boleíta (Caracas), the headquarters of the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN), and other national prisons, including Rodeo I. All of these facilities have denied holding Yevhenii. None of the legal remedies filed have yielded information about his fate and whereabouts.
Yevhenii is Ukrainian and, like almost all foreigners detained in Venezuela, is denied his right to consular assistance. Like him, there are citizens of Colombia, such as Danner Barajas; of France, like Camilo Castro; and Spaniards, like José María Basoa and Andrés Martínez, among other nationalities, who have been victims of forced disappearance, arbitrary detention, denial of consular assistance, and countless other human rights violations.
Yevhenii is in a particularly vulnerable situation. Ukraine is resisting a Russian invasion and, furthermore, lacks consular representation in Venezuela. Although his mother-in-law contacted other embassies in the country, she received no support.
Neither Yevhenii nor the other detained foreigners are casualties or isolated victims, but rather are among the thousands of victims — the vast majority of whom are Venezuelan — of the Maduro government’s policy of repression, which seeks to silence dissent, even using foreigners as diplomatic leverage.
While Yevhenii has been subjected to enforced disappearance for a year, more than 830 people are unjustly detained in the country, according to the Venezuelan NGO Foro Penal. This is a huge figure that cannot be normalized or relativized. The human rights crisis in the country not only persists but is worsening.
Crimes against humanity continue to be committed in Venezuela today. Meanwhile, the eyes of the world are on the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, anxiously awaiting decisive steps toward justice for the victims.
States with the ability to do so must redouble their efforts to protect detainees and secure their immediate release. The time to take action for them is today, not tomorrow. Yevhenii should be home now.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
María Fernanda Angulo, or Mafe, as she prefers to be called, is anxiously counting down the days until November 7. On that date, 250,000 Venezuelans who, like her, live and work in the United States as beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status (TPS), will become undocumented. “That day I lose everything: I lose my driver’s license, I lose my status, and I lose my work permit. And deportation proceedings may be initiated against me, which would separate me from the family I’ve built here,” she says in a video interview with EL PAÍS.
On October 3, the Supreme Court, in a ruling of just three paragraphs, reiterated a decision it had made in May and put 350,000 Venezuelans who had been granted TPS in 2023 at risk of deportation. The decision will now affect another 250,000 Venezuelans whose temporary residence permit expires on November 7.
The TPS case for Venezuelans remains unresolved in the courts. Upon returning to the White House, Donald Trump enacted several measures aimed at eliminating programs that had previously allowed immigrants to reside in the country. Among these was TPS, which his predecessor, Joe Biden, had granted in 2021 and 2023 to Venezuelans fleeing the worsening political and economic situation in their country. The Democrat, just a few days before the end of his term, extended the permit for 18 months to October 2026, but the Trump administration’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, revoked it.
Advocacy organizations took the case to court, and on September 5, District Judge Edward M. Chen ruled that Noem’s attempt to eliminate TPS for Venezuelans and Haitians was illegal. The Secretary’s actions in reversing the previous administration’s order and terminating TPS “are unauthorized by law, arbitrary and capricious, and motivated by unconstitutional animus,” Chen wrote.
The government has appealed the ruling, but while the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals resolves the case, the Supreme Court has left the 600,000 Venezuelans who resided legally in the country without protection.
A salary to buy a Coke and chips
Mafe, 33, arrived in the United States in 2019 to reunite with her mother and other relatives, and in 2021 she was granted Temporary Protected Status (TPS). Congress created this program in 1990 to protect from deportation citizens of countries experiencing armed conflict, natural disasters, or other extraordinary and temporary conditions. Biden included Venezuela due to the worsening conditions under Nicolás Maduro’s regime.
For Mafe, as for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, life in her country was unbearable. The lack of freedom and the repression of any opposition to the government were compounded by the economic crisis. “My last salary from my job at the time as a primary school psychologist was literally only enough to buy me a two-liter bottle of Coca-Cola and a bag of potato chips,” she explains. By the end of 2018, before traveling to the U.S., the situation had worsened, and “many people were eating whatever they could find in the trash. It was very common not to eat any protein, only vegetables, even spoiled food,” she recalls.
The government’s iron fist intensified in a bid to keep the opposition in check, and repression filled the prisons with political prisoners. “You love your country, but the truth is that since ’99 Venezuela has ceased to be a real country to live in,” she says with sadness.
Mafe lives in South Florida with her partner and two stepchildren. Temporary Protected Status (TPS) allowed her to work for an organization that helps other immigrants. “I’ve been here working legally, doing things the right way,” she says, but as soon as she learned that Trump had won the November 2024 election, she began to worry. “I saw it coming,” she says, because TPS is only a temporary status and doesn’t provide a path to permanent residency or citizenship. Since then, her life has changed. “It’s been a really tough year, very difficult psychologically.” Mafe has suffered from anxiety and has needed the help of a psychologist.
The fear of migrant raids, which have proliferated across the country and in Florida are carried out with the assistance of local law enforcement, has terrified her since January. “I went to the beach one day with my boys and some border patrol vehicles drove by. Even though I had legal status, I felt terrified. I thought, ‘That’s it.’ There’s an uncertainty and a fear that you live with all the time, even if you don’t want to.”
Mafe fears being arrested and having her whole life fall apart. She’s also afraid of returning to Venezuela. “I’m terrified of going back to Venezuela, I’m even terrified of giving you this interview and that it could result in legal proceedings against me if I go back to Venezuela,” she admits. One of her close friends is imprisoned for having participated in the campaign for María Corina Machado, the opposition leader to Maduro who recently received the Nobel Peace Prize.
Trump has justified his crusade against immigration by saying that migrants arriving in the United States, particularly those from Venezuela, are criminals or come from institutions for the mentally ill.
“It’s very easy to say that 600,000 Venezuelans are bad people, who came here to do harm, but the truth is that they are people who want to do things the right way, to work to be able to provide their families with a different future,” Mafe maintains.
Neither criminal nor crazy
Mariano Santana cannot be classified as a criminal, nor as mentally ill. This 29-year-old Venezuelan arrived in the United States in 2014, right after graduating, to study music at the renowned Berklee College of Music in Boston. It was a dream he had longed to fulfill, one that was precipitated by an incident in Caracas, where he was born. The month after graduating from high school, in August 2014, he was the victim of an armed robbery that could have turned, like so many others, into a kidnapping. It was just one more example of the insecurity plaguing his country. The experience convinced his family that Mariano should leave to seek a better life in the United States.
Despite the trauma, Mariano felt empathy for his assailant. “I thought about what reality is like in a place where so many people reach that point. That says a lot about the country. In the end, it’s all about survival,” he says.
At age 10, a visit to New York City left a lasting impression on him. “Two hours after arriving, I fell in love with the city and told my mom, ‘I want to live here when I grow up.’ And, thank God, I did,” he tells EL PAÍS via video conference from Boston. Both his dream of studying at Berklee and of living in the Big Apple came true. Now, however, everything he has built in the last 11 years is teetering on the brink.
Mariano is also a TPS beneficiary and will lose his work permit on November 7. A professional musician, he combines performing with composing and teaching music to children. Among his artistic achievements is his participation in a three-month tour with the Mexican band RBD in 2023, which included 30 concerts in large U.S. stadiums and sold-out shows at Madison Square Garden on both nights.
Before obtaining TPS, he combined student visas with scholarships and tried various avenues to obtain a work permit that would allow him to support himself. The bureaucracy was cumbersome and slow. He almost lost his residency permit when he was about to graduate and faced financial difficulties.
He suffered from depression and anxiety at the thought of having to return to Venezuela. When Biden authorized Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans in 2021, he applied and was able to work. He earned enough to support himself and send money to his parents, who, years after he left, also settled in the United States.
A deep religious faith and an optimistic nature allowed him to overcome the difficulties he encountered along the way, where he met other migrants carrying even worse traumas. “In New York, I connected with other people who left their country on foot, crossed the jungle with babies, with children, seeing dead bodies, really terrifying things. I feel blessed because I left Venezuela by plane,” he recounts.
Mariano applied for TPS renewal this year, though he admits that since Trump’s election victory, he knew difficult times were ahead. “I invested in the renewal knowing it might be worthless, that I was going to lose my money,” he says. Now he feels a great deal of uncertainty, but he tries not to let it paralyze him: “I don’t let it eat away at me, because if it does, I’ll freeze up.” He’s grown accustomed to living with fear and not letting it control him. “Living in Venezuela, there was always panic. Everything was about survival. And I feel like I have that built into my system. It’s already part of me.”
Now he finds parallels between what he left behind and the current reality of the United States. “What I feel now is that there are many similarities with Venezuela. In terms of corruption, in terms of fascism, in terms of having no interest or compassion for human beings,” he reflects.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
U.S. President Donald Trump believes Nicolás Maduro’s days as Venezuelan leader are numbered, but he also “doubts” that his country will go to war with the Caribbean nation. He made these remarks in an interview with CBS’s 60 Minutes, recorded last Friday and broadcast on Sunday, in which the anchor questioned him about the situation between the two countries and the U.S. military presence in the region.
Asked by journalist Nora O’Donnell about the large concentration of U.S. warships deployed in international waters of the Caribbean, bordering Venezuelan territorial waters, and whether there will be a war between the two countries, Trump replied: “I doubt it. I don’t think so. But they’ve been treating us very badly, not only on drugs.”
The U.S. president went on to repeat his usual claims that the Chavista regime has emptied its prisons and sanatoriums in order to send convicts and the mentally ill to the United States.
When the journalist asked him if he believed Maduro’s days as Venezuelan leader were numbered, Trump replied, “I would say yeah. I think so, yeah.” But he declined to elaborate.
Since September 2, the United States has carried out at least 16 extrajudicial attacks against vessels in the Caribbean and the Pacific, which it claims, without providing evidence, were attempting to transport drugs to U.S. territory. At least 64 people have been killed in these strikes, and there are only three known survivors: a Peruvian citizen and a Colombian national who were repatriated to their countries, and a third person who was rescued alive in an attack last Wednesday.
Initially, the Trump Administration justified these operations as essential to fighting the drug cartels, with which the White House considers it to be in an “armed conflict.”
But gradually, Trump has been hinting that this campaign may be a cover for an attempt to bring down Maduro. His administration accuses the Venezuelan president of being a drug kingpin, maintains that Venezuela is a narco-state, and has doubled the reward for the Chavista leader’s capture to $50 million. The U.S. president has authorized the CIA to conduct covert missions in the Caribbean country and frequently says that the current campaign against the boats is entering a “second phase” on land.
When O’Donnell asked him about the possibility of land strikes, the president declined to give a clear answer. “I’m not saying it’s true or untrue. I wouldn’t be inclined to say I would do that, but I don’t talk to a reporter about whether or not I’m going to strike.”
The United States maintains a dozen ships in the Caribbean, carrying 10,000 troops and F-35 fighter jets. In the coming days, they will be joined by the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford, the largest and most modern in its fleet. The nuclear-powered Ford has a crew of 5,000.
The most recent attack reported by the United States took place on Saturday, according to a social media post by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. All three people on board were reportedly killed in the attack.
As usual, Hegseth has not provided specific details about the identity of the crew, the type of drugs they were allegedly transporting, or the criminal gang that, according to the United States, controlled the vessel.
The post merely asserts that the alleged drug-running boat was operated by a “designated terrorist organization.” In February, the State Department added the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua to its list, along with six Mexican cartels: Sinaloa, Jalisco New Generation, Northwest and Gulf, as well as La Nueva Familia Michoacana and Carteles Unidos.
“This vessel, like all the others, was known by our intelligence to be involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, was transiting along a known narco-trafficking route, and carrying narcotics,” Hegseth wrote.
The Secretary of Defense accompanied his message on social media, as has also become customary, with a video showing the moment the U.S. missile hit the vessel.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
“No.” That was the emphatic response given by U.S. President Donald Trump aboard Air Force One when asked about a series of reports claiming that a U.S. strike on military targets in Venezuela was imminent. Has Trump decided to order such an attack? “No, it’s not true,” he replied, in a terser style than usual.
With this, Trump put the theory on hold that he is willing to cross another Rubicon by launching an offensive in Venezuelan territory against targets — civilian and military — allegedly linked to drug trafficking.
On Thursday, it emerged — thanks to reporting by The Wall Street Journal — that the Pentagon had identified targets in Venezuelan territory, including ports and airports under military control, which Washington accuses of being connected to drug cartels, particularly the Cartel of the Suns. Beyond combating drug trafficking, the move would be viewed as an escalation against Venezuela, much like previous attacks on alleged drug boats have been seen as efforts aimed at pressuring Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and destabilizing the Chavista regime.
This Friday, theMiami Herald reported that the next step could be “a matter of days or even hours.” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly later denied this, saying that such news cannot rely on “unnamed sources.” “Any announcements regarding Venezuela policy would come directly from the president,” she said.
An operation of this magnitude would represent a major escalation of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America and revive the specter of U.S. interference in the region. So far, the situation seems to be moving that way: for the past two months, the U.S. military has carried out 15 extrajudicial attacks against 16 vessels (including a submarine) allegedly involved in drug trafficking in the Caribbean and Pacific waters. At least 61 people have been killed in these operations.
The White House accuses Maduro’s government of leading a criminal organization engaged in drug trafficking. Last August, U.S. authorities doubled the reward to $50 million for any information leading to the capture of the Venezuelan president, who last year, according to much of the international community, stole the elections from the opposition led by recent Nobel Peace Prize laureate María Corina Machado. Rewards of $25 million are also offered for some of Maduro’s lieutenants, such as Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello and Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López.
As U.S. attacks on the alleged drug boats continued, the United States ordered a military deployment of unprecedented scale. Trump considers the crews — whose identities are unconfirmed and for whom there is no evidence of wrongdoing — to be members of an army waging war on the U.S. by flooding it with fentanyl and cocaine. The operations began in August.
Around 10 warships, including a nuclear submarine, and 10,000 troops have moved into the area of influence of U.S. Southern Command. Last Friday, Trump ordered the deployment of the largest and most modern aircraft carrier in the fleet, the Gerald R. Ford, to the Caribbean. The warship, with a crew of more than 5,000 sailors, was in Europe at the time and had just passed through the Strait of Gibraltar. It is expected to reach the region early next week.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the planned attacks on Venezuela — that Trump now denies — would have been carried out from the air with very precise targets.
Trump’s categorical denial on Friday recalled memories in Washington of the U.S. strike on three uranium enrichment and storage sites in Iran last June.
At that time, it was the same New York-based newspaper that reported the attack was imminent. The U.S. president later refused to clarify whether the plans were true, and went to play golf. The next day, bombs fell on sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition