La patronal clama contra el absentismo laboral. Con informes recientes, alerta de un coste “insostenible” y reclama medidas urgentes. CCOO denuncia una manipulación interesada de los datos y la peligrosa receta de culpabilizar al trabajador de su enfermedad y privatizar el control de la salud. Queremos desmontar mentiras y poner el foco en la degradación de las condiciones de trabajo y el colapso del sistema sanitario.

La patronal considera “absentismo” cualquier ausencia, incluyendo el ejercicio de derechos fundamentales como el crédito sindical, los permisos por defunción, la maternidad o las vacaciones. Pero la realidad es tozuda: el absentismo sin cobertura legal es anecdótico y se sitúa en torno al 1%. La inmensa mayoría de las horas no trabajadas corresponden a situaciones amparadas por la ley, principalmente la incapacidad temporal prescrita por un médico. Hablar aquí de absentismo es cuestionar el derecho a la salud y al descanso.

La patronal dice que cuando la economía va bien, las bajas suben, insinuando un “abuso” por parte de los trabajadores. La lectura de CCOO es radicalmente opuesta: no es capricho, es presentismo. En tiempos de crisis, el miedo a perder el empleo obliga a miles de personas a ir a trabajar enfermas. La Encuesta de Calidad y Condiciones de Trabajo recoge que el 51,3% de los encuestados acudió a trabajar al menos un día enfermo. Esta asistencia forzada empeora la salud, cronifica patologías y aumenta el riesgo de contagios y accidentes.

Uno de los argumentos estrella es el aumento de la duración y los costes de las bajas. Cabe recordar que estos costes los asumen antes que nadie los trabajadores (los tres primeros días de baja no se suele cobrar prestación). Catalunya es de las comunidades con mayor incidencia de bajas, ciertamente, pero con una duración más corta que la media española. Esto sugiere reincorporaciones sin estar plenamente recuperadas, provocando recaídas. El cuello de botella está en la sanidad pública: a finales de 2025, más de 93.000 personas esperaban visita de traumatología, con una media de espera de 178 días. Culpabilizar al paciente de la ineficiencia del sistema por falta de inversión es cinismo.

La “solución” que propone la patronal es otorgar a las mutuas —asociaciones privadas de empresarios— el poder de dar el alta médica por contingencias comunes. Eso es poner al zorro a vigilar el gallinero. La experiencia demuestra que las mutuas actúan con criterios economicistas, forzando altas prematuras, derivando enfermedades de origen laboral al sistema público y poniendo en riesgo la salud para reducir costes empresariales.

La patronal llora por los costes del absentismo, pero calla ante su responsabilidad en las enfermedades. Las patologías osteomusculares y mentales (causas principales de baja) están directamente relacionadas con la organización del trabajo y el envejecimiento de las plantillas. La inversión en prevención es mínima: solo el 19,86% de las empresas tienen una evaluación ergonómica específica, y solo el 5,55% han evaluado los riesgos psicosociales.

Así las cosas, es grave la deriva del Departament de Salut de la Generalitat. Debe decidir si está del lado de la salud pública o si prefiere actuar como capataz de la patronal, aplicando una medicina que trata al paciente como sospechoso. En CCOO lo tenemos claro: con la salud ni se juega ni se mercadea.

Belén López Sánchez es la secretaria general de CCOO de Catalunya

The regional health authorities of Spain’s Cataluña region have officially informed the World Health Organisation (WHO) and national health bodies of a confirmed human infection with swine influenza A (H1N1) in the province of Lleida. The case was identified through routine epidemiological surveillance, prompting a full public health investigation and inter‑institutional assessment. 

The patient, an 83‑year‑old resident of Lleida, was diagnosed with swine flu following clinical evaluation and laboratory testing that included polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and genetic sequencing. Regional health officials reported that the man was not presenting typical flu symptoms when tested and had sought medical care for unrelated health issues. He was reported to be in stable condition following the detection. 

According to the Department of Health of the Generalitat of Cataluña, the positive diagnosis was made on February 11 after the elderly patient attended a healthcare facility for treatment of other conditions. Hospital staff collected samples as part of the influenza surveillance system, which then returned positive results for H1N1. Subsequent genetic sequencing at a designated reference laboratory confirmed the presence of a swine influenza strain in the sample. 

Following confirmation, epidemiological, microbiological, and communication protocols were activated. On February 13, the health department notified the Centro de Coordinación de Alertas y Emergencias Sanitarias (CCAES), the national health alert coordination body in Spain. The CCAES transmitted the information to the WHO in accordance with the International Health Regulations (IHR). 

Origin of Infection and Contact Tracing

Health authorities have stated that neither the patient nor any of his close contacts had known exposure to pigs, pig farms, or other potential animal sources of swine flu prior to diagnosis. Epidemiological investigations thus far have not identified any direct link to animal contact, which is typically associated with human cases of swine influenza. All individuals identified as close contacts have been monitored, and none have developed symptoms or tested positive for the virus. 

Laboratory reviews also included checks to exclude contamination or procedural errors in sample collection, processing, and analysis. Officials reported that all stages of the diagnostic process were reviewed to ensure the result was valid and reflective of true infection. 

The source of infection remains unclear, and health authorities continue to investigate whether transmission may have occurred through another human or an environmental source that has not yet been identified. Surveillance systems in the region have not detected any unusual uptick in respiratory illnesses since the case was confirmed. 

Public Health Response and Risk Assessment

Government health officials have reported that swine influenza viruses circulate widely among pig populations but only occasionally infect humans, usually those with direct animal exposure. In Spain, this is the fourth human case of swine flu reported since 2009 and the first in 2026. Previous cases have been associated with contact with infected animals, most often on farms. 

In this instance, public health authorities described the risk of transmission to the wider community as “very low”, based on current evidence and the absence of secondary cases among identified contacts. Health officials from Cataluña, the national CCAES, and WHO are conducting joint evaluations to fully characterise the event and assess any implications for public health surveillance and response. 

The secretary of public health for the Generalitat, reinforced that ongoing monitoring, data collection, and laboratory analysis are key components of the response. Contact tracing remains active, but no further infections linked to this case have been confirmed. Information from ongoing investigations will inform whether additional measures are needed to detect or prevent further transmission. 

Context of Swine Influenza Infections

Swine influenza is caused by influenza A viruses that normally circulate in pig populations, human infections are uncommon and generally occur following direct contact with infected swine. Person‑to‑person transmission in swine influenza is rare and, when documented, has typically been limited in scope. 

Swine influenza viruses can sometimes acquire genetic changes that allow them to infect humans more readily or re-assort with human influenza strains. This potential for genetic change makes surveillance at the human–animal interface and rapid reporting of unusual cases extremely necessary. However, current assessments of this case do not indicate evidence of sustained human‑to‑human transmission. 

Official statements have also differentiated this case from outbreaks involving African swine fever, a separate viral disease that affects pigs and wild boars and has recently been present in parts of Cataluña but does not infect humans. Officials clarified that the swine flu case is caused by a distinct influenza virus unrelated to African swine fever. 

Ongoing Surveillance and International Reporting

In line with international public health regulations, Spain’s notification to the WHO ensures that global health authorities are informed and able to coordinate evaluation and risk assessment. The involvement of the WHO and national public health agencies reflects established procedures for reporting zoonotic infections in humans and contributes to global efforts to monitor potential emerging infectious disease threats. 

Regional health authorities have indicated that they will continue to monitor surveillance data for any new developments. At present, the individual affected remains in good condition, and the case constitutes an isolated event pending further investigation. No policy changes or public health restrictions have been recommended based on current evidence.