Connect with us

california

The Detained Honduran Family Suing Trump: ‘Targeting Children Is Unconscionable’

Published

on

the-detained-honduran-family-suing-trump:-‘targeting-children-is-unconscionable’

A month ago, two children ages six and nine showed up in a California court with their mother for what they thought would be a routine hearing in their asylum case. But, as has happened to many immigrants in recent weeks, the judge in charge of the case dismissed it after having been ordered to do so by the government.

When the Honduran family left the courtroom, several immigration agents were waiting outside to arrest them. The family has filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration for those arrests, which took place on May 29. According to their lawyers, this lawsuit is the first “to challenge the arrests of minors under a new directive that encourages arrests in court.”

The lawsuit, to which EL PAÍS has had access, identifies the plaintiffs as N.M.Z., a six-year-old boy with leukemia, his sister D.M.Z., nine, and their mother, Mrs. Z. The three fled Honduras after receiving death threats and entered the U.S. in October 2024 with an appointment from CBP One, an application created by the Joe Biden administration to manage legal access to the country; in January, this system was eliminated by Donald Trump. The White House also revoked residence and work permits granted through the application and ordered its beneficiaries to leave the country.

After entering the U.S., the mother and her two children settled in Los Angeles, where they integrated into the community and began to study English, pending their court date in May. “N.M.Z. and D.M.Z. enrolled in a local public school, played with their friends, and enjoyed painting. N.M.Z. played soccer at a local park and the family attended church every Sunday,” the document explains.

During the family’s asylum case hearing, the mother tried to tell the judge that they wished to proceed with their asylum case. However, the Department of Homeland Security requested that their case be dismissed, and the judge immediately granted the request. The three were then arrested by plainclothes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and transferred to a detention center in Texas, where they remain.

The lawsuit includes a habeas corpus petition challenging the legality of their detention, and a motion for precautionary measures; it alleges that the detention was arbitrary, unlawful and part of a new policy that seeks to transform ordinary removal cases into expedited deportations, which are executed without a hearing and with little possibility of legal defense.

“The detention of this family is not only illegal, but also morally unacceptable,” the lawyers say in the text. N.M.Z. was diagnosed with leukemia at the age of three and missed a doctor’s appointment on June 5 because he was in custody. Currently, the child has bruises, bone pain, paleness and loss of appetite, symptoms that indicate a relapse. The suit notes that the Dilley City Detention Center, where they are being held, has a poor record of medical care for minors.

The lawsuit also lays out nine constitutional and legal claims, including the violation of due process, detaining a family that did not pose a flight risk without a prior hearing; and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, for conducting arrests without probable cause.

“This policy of arrest in the courts is completely new and contradicts established practices and laws. It is extraordinary and, therefore, raises new problems,” Daniel Hatoum, supervising attorney with the Texas Civil Right Project (TCRP), the legal organization handling the case, told EL PAÍS. “This family is particularly vulnerable, given the age of the children and the fact that one of them has been treated for leukemia. They need immediate help.”

According to Hatoum, the outcome of the lawsuit is still pending despite the fact that the lawyers have requested an expedited procedure. “The judge has ordered the government to respond to the lawsuit, and it must do so before next week,” he said.

He also said that the TCRP believes that this case will promote reforms in the immigration system. “We hope that it will set a precedent against these judicial arrests, especially of minors who have received permission to enter the country and who meet all the standards established by the federal government,” he said.

“We need real limits on the detention of civilian immigrants. Immigration detention is costly and harmful. It’s expensive because we all have to foot the bill, which, by some estimates, is nearly 10 times more expensive than letting families be free while they process their immigration cases,” he added. “We should be outraged by the squandering of our federal taxes on unnecessary cruelty, which also drives from society those who support their families, mothers and students, people who come to this country to contribute.”

Hatoum stressed that many of these detention centers are known for their terrible living conditions. “People who were held in facilities of this type died during the first Trump administration,” he said. “We hope that, by winning this case, we can limit the number of people detained by immigration.”

Attorney Elora Mukherjee, a professor at Columbia Law School who also represents the family, said that this case exemplifies “the cruelty of the immigration policies” of the current government. “This family complied with all the requirements of U.S. immigration laws and now suffers needlessly in detention, when they should be released,” she said. “Hundreds, if not thousands, of law-abiding aliens have been arrested in immigration courts in recent weeks, despite a federal court ruling that ICE’s new courthouse arrest policy is illegal and unconstitutional. Targeting children under this policy is simply unconscionable,” she said.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

America

Fourth Of July In California: Cancellations Due To ICE Fears, And Where Celebrations Will Still Take Place

Published

on

fourth-of-july-in-california:-cancellations-due-to-ice-fears,-and-where-celebrations-will-still-take-place

It will be an Independence Day marked with fear. Although the Fourth of July is just around the corner, many people in California will not be celebrating due to the threat of arrests and deportations that have been taking place for months and continue under the Trump administration’s new immigration policy. Cities have canceled traditional celebrations to avoid putting their residents at risk, demonstrating the level of fear that exists among both citizens and local officials.

In addition, this July 4 will bring other changes in California. Some localities will forego fireworks due to their environmental impact and the risk of repeating the tragedies that occurred earlier this year with the forest fires that devastated various areas. Instead, there will be light shows with drones, which could be part of the new normal for the future.

Here are all the key details of this year’s Fourth of July celebrations:

Fear of ICE

Fear has taken hold in Los Angeles. Ahead of the Fourth of July celebrations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) stepped up its operations in predominantly Latino neighborhoods. The presence of agents in parking lots, residential streets, and food stalls has sparked a climate of fear that has forced the cancellation of Independence Day celebrations.

There is no respite, not even for celebrations. Unlike other years, several localities in Los Angeles County have chosen to cancel or postpone their traditional patriotic celebrations. This is not due to logistical or budgetary problems, but rather a decision motivated by fear.

One of the most symbolic cases is the parade in El Sereno, a historically Latino neighborhood on the east side of the city, which this year would have celebrated the 66th edition of its traditional Independence Day parade.

“This year we will have to cancel our celebrations. We stand with our community. The safety of our participants, spectators, and volunteers is always at the forefront. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused,” the Bicentennial Committee said in a statement posted on its Facebook page.

It is with a heavy heart that we announce the cancellation of this year’s 66th Annual Independence Day Parade. Please…

Publicado por Genny Guerrero en Viernes, 20 de junio de 2025

Other communities responded right away, with a series of cancellations clearing out the county’s event schedule:

  • Cudahy announced the postponement of its Independence Day celebration, with no new date set.
  • Bell Gardens canceled all municipal activities, including its Fourth of July celebration.
  • Huntington Park suspended its patriotic celebrations and postponed other community events for the coming weeks.
  • In Whittier, the traditional Freedom Walk was canceled, although the fireworks display planned for York Field will go ahead.
  • At Gloria Molina Grand Park in downtown Los Angeles, the popular Summer Block Party was postponed.
  • The Los Angeles County Parks Department canceled the “Rockin’ Fourth of July” event.
  • In Rowland Heights, the Summer Movies & Concerts series at Peter F. Schabarum Regional Park has also been postponed.

Other cancellations

Other factors have influenced the cancellation of Fourth of July events. Such is the case with Santa Monica’s official fireworks display, which has been canceled due to lack of funds. At the Board of Trustees meeting, Superintendent Kathryn E. Jeffery said that the partners who usually help fund the event have withdrawn. And Santa Monica College cannot use its general fund for the fireworks display because it is a “non-educational event.”

Goodbye fireworks?

On the other hand, cities such as Pasadena will make a significant change: for the first time in more than 20 years, there will be no fireworks. Instead, they will hold a drone show to honor wildfire victims and reduce risks of more wildfires.

The city was one of the hardest hit by the Eaton Fire in January of this year. At a press conference, Lisa Derderian, spokesperson for the city, said that this change will be “better for the environment, air quality, and noise. It’s something new and exciting.” She also noted that it doesn’t take much for mountain vegetation to burn. “A sparkler that can reach 1,200 degrees or a fire that goes astray” can be enough. Similarly, all types of fireworks have been banned, including those considered less dangerous.

For its part, Long Beach will hold its last fireworks display this year due to similar environmental concerns and will also switch to a drone show, which is expected to be replicated in other cities in the coming years.

In the case of Orange County, it has been designated a high fire risk area, so security personnel will be deployed to ensure that no one holds private fireworks displays.

Where will there be Fourth of July celebrations?

The Los Angeles County Fire Department has a list of all the cities in California where there will be fireworks on the Fourth of July. While cities such as Lakewood and Lomita held events on June 28, most will launch fireworks from the evening of Thursday, July 3, through Saturday, July 5. All fireworks displays begin around 9.00 pm.

Southern California will offer a wide range of celebrations, from traditional fireworks to modern drone shows. In Woodland Hills, Warner Center Park will host a free concert and a 20-minute fireworks display, while Universal Studios Hollywood and Six Flags Magic Mountain will close out the evening with fireworks shows.

Families in Claremont, Gardena, Marina del Rey, South Pasadena, and Long Beach will also be able to view fireworks at various parks and coastal areas. The Queen Mary will offer fireworks on deck and a retro celebration, while the Hollywood Bowl and Hollywood Forever will combine live performances and movies with nighttime fireworks. Dodger Stadium will close its baseball game with fireworks, and Disneyland promises a patriotic finale after 9.30 p.m.

As mentioned, the Rose Bowl and Pacific Palisades will replace fireworks with drone light shows due to concerns about wildfires, with events that will include food festivals and music. Huntington Beach will continue with its iconic fireworks display on the waterfront, which attracts more than half a million spectators, while Knott’s Berry Farm will offer fun at the theme park, culminating in fireworks.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Continue Reading

America

2025 Gold Cup Semifinals: Who’s Playing And Where To Watch In The US

Published

on

2025-gold-cup-semifinals:-who’s-playing-and-where-to-watch-in-the-us

The 2025 Gold Cup final is approaching, and it could see Mexico facing the hosts, the United States. After some exciting quarterfinals (for the most part), a continental semifinal is on the horizon, as the guest team, Saudi Arabia, has been eliminated from this CONCACAF tournament.

Mexico defeated the Saudis in a disappointing match at Glendale Stadium. Despite dominating the match, Javier Aguirre’s team barely managed to score a goal (courtesy of Deportivo Toluca striker Alexis Vega). Despite multiple opportunities, the game was decided by an own goal from Abdullah Madu in the final minutes — a tragic end for the Saudis.

Prior to this match, Panama and Honduras battled for a spot in the semifinals. First, a penalty kick in Panama’s favor ended up in the net thanks to Ismael Díaz de León, but a key shot by Anthony Lozano — who currently plays for Mexico’s Santos Laguna club — gave Honduras the tie, resulting in a tense penalty shootout that ended in victory for the Hondurans. They will now face Mexico in what will be a difficult match to predict the outcome of.

The United States also reached the semifinals after overcoming a penalty shootout. Mauricio Pochettino’s team faced Costa Rica in the best quarterfinal match. The Costa Ricans started with a penalty scored by captain Francisco Calvo; however, the rest of the match was dominated by the Americans until, in the 71st minute, Adrián Martínez of New York City FC managed to equalize the score, leading to a penalty shootout that went in favor of the United States. The Ticos will have to wait for another championship to try again.

In the semifinals, the United States will face Guatemala, a team that surprised everyone by defeating Canada in a penalty shootout. For much of the match, they were behind on the scoreboard until a shot by forward Rubio Méndez Rubín tied the game. The United States is the favorite to advance to the final, which could result in a final against Mexico — if Javier Aguirre’s team can organize their ranks and establish a clear strategy to defeat Honduras.

The matches will be held in different cities. The match between the United States and Guatemala will be at Energizer Park in St. Louis, Missouri, while Mexico and Guatemala will play at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California, which will also be used for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Here is the key information about the semifinals:

Wednesday, July 2

United States vs. Guatemala

  • Where: Energizer Park, St. Louis
  • Time: 7.00 pm (local time)

Mexico vs. Honduras

  • Where: Levi’s Stadium, Santa Clara
  • Time: 10.00 pm (local time)

Where to watch the games?

The quarterfinal matches and the rest of the Gold Cup will be broadcast on FOX Sports, FS1, FS2, and their online streaming service in English. To enjoy them in Spanish, you can watch them on Univision, TUDN, and ViX+.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Continue Reading

Aprendizaje

Diana Sánchez-Cornejo: “Desde Primaria, Nuestros Alumnos Intervienen En La Contratación De Sus Profesores”

Published

on

diana-sanchez-cornejo:-“desde-primaria,-nuestros-alumnos-intervienen-en-la-contratacion-de-sus-profesores”

Diana Cornejo-Sánchez, 43 años, es desde hace 18 meses la directora general de High Tech High, una red de escuelas e institutos de California que alcanzó celebridad en el mundo de la innovación educativa al convertirse en protagonista de una película documental estrenada en el festival de Sundance en 2015. La cinta contaba el origen de un proyecto que empezó en el año 2000 y cuenta ahora con 6.400 alumnos repartidos en 16 centros educativos, todos en el condado de San Diego. Hija de emigrantes mexicanos, doctorada en liderazgo educativo, y poseedora de una risa contagiosa, Cornejo-Sánchez responde a la entrevista en un impecable castellano, en una mesa situada al fondo de una calurosa cafetería del centro de Barcelona, ciudad en la que aterrizó el 25 de junio para respaldar la presentación de Futurs de l’Educació, un colectivo de centros educativos públicos catalanes innovadores que tienen en High Tech High a uno de sus referentes.

Pregunta. Sus escuelas se llamarían, en España, concertadas. ¿Qué tipo de alumnado asiste a ellas?

Respuesta. Es muy diverso. Tenemos más demanda que plazas, y la matrícula se hace a través de una aplicación en la que solo aparecen datos básicos, como el código postal. Las plazas se sortean, como en una especie de lotería, de forma que la matrícula sea representativa de todo el condado de San Diego, donde hay barrios de extracción económica y social muy diferentes.

P. ¿Las familias pagan cuotas?

R. No, ninguna. Uno de nuestros pilares básicos es la equidad.

P. ¿Qué distingue a sus centros educativos?

R. Nuestros principios básicos, además de la equidad, son la personalización de la educación, el trabajo auténtico y la colaboración. Nuestra metodología es activa; los estudiantes aprenden haciendo, no solo recibiendo clases y haciendo exámenes. Demuestran sus aprendizajes mediante proyectos, presentaciones, exhibiciones a las que vienen todas las familias y en las que los estudiantes explican sus creaciones y el proceso que les llevó hasta ellas. Y al final de la secundaria pasan tres semanas haciendo prácticas en empresas e instituciones, con el horario de cualquier trabajador, para que puedan explorar sus pasiones e intereses.

P. ¿Mezclan las asignaturas?

R. Nuestras escuelas son pequeñas, tienen entre 300 y 425 estudiantes. Están centradas en las relaciones y la colaboración entre el alumnado, entre el profesorado, y entre unos y otros. Y el trabajo es bastante interdisciplinar. Las materias no están aisladas en el sentido de decir: esta es la clase de matemáticas y solo se hacen matemáticas. Tratamos de romper las barreras de las disciplinas para llegar a un aprendizaje más profundo.

P. En España hay voces que, siendo partidarias del Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos, creen que lo mejor es alternar esta metodología con la instrucción directa, más tradicional, en la que el peso del profesor como conductor de las clases es mayor. ¿Qué opina?

R. Nosotros también hemos debatido mucho sobre esto. Y creo que se trata de lograr un equilibrio entre los dos métodos para llegar a ese aprendizaje profundo. Cuando diseñas un proyecto, debe tener un contenido. De lo contrario, ¿cuál sería el propósito? Tiene que tener contenidos académicos, sí, pero también una vertiente social. Y puede haber clases más tradicionales, la cuestión es que no sean así cada día del año.

Diana Cornejo-Sánchez en el instituto público Angeleta Ferrer de Barcelona.

P. Su proyecto educativo trata de que el alumnado desarrolle competencias socioemocionales, de autorregulación, de aprender a aprender. Uno de los problemas es cómo medir el éxito de dicho objetivo. Algo que sí puede hacerse con las propuestas más tradicionales a través de las pruebas estandarizadas.

R. Las personas tendemos a seguir el método de educación que conocemos. El tradicional es el del profesor impartiendo una materia al frente de la clase, con los alumnos sentados en filas, con las cabezas bajas, y tomando notas. El problema es que así creamos estudiantes que quizá no pueden pensar por sí mismos, no saben hacer preguntas difíciles, y cuestionar por qué pasan las cosas. Y eso se traslada al mundo del trabajo. Vemos grandes compañías que dicen: los trabajadores no saben comunicarse, colaborar… Al mismo tiempo, es cierto que muchas de estas otras competencias son difíciles de medir. Cómo mides, por ejemplo, la resiliencia de una persona. O la empatía. Es difícil, como evaluar una relación, porque son habilidades relacionales.

P. Una preocupación habitual en las familias es si, estudiando con dichos métodos, a sus hijos les irá bien en los exámenes de acceso a la universidad. ¿Cómo les va en ese terreno?

R. Somos la organización de escuelas de San Diego con resultados más altos en asistencia a la universidad una vez que se gradúan, a pesar de nuestra diversidad. Y estamos rompiendo las estadísticas de muchos distritos.

P. ¿Los estudiantes de sus centros educativos intervienen en la contratación de los nuevos profesores?

R. Sí. En realidad, intervienen para la contratación en casi todos los puestos. Incluso para el mío tuve entrevistas con estudiantes. Los aspirantes primero tienen una entrevista con la directora o el director. Y luego se les invita a dar una clase, una demostración. Por ella pasan directores de varias de nuestras escuelas, y también otros profesores, para observarlos. Pero los alumnos están durante toda la clase, y su voz es muy importante. Ya en primaria son conscientes del tipo de maestro que quieren. Nos dicen cosas como: “Me hizo pensar”; “me gustó que respetase mi opinión”; “me gustó que no gritara”; “caminaba y estaba presente por toda el aula”; “nos dio una clase donde tuvimos que crear algo”, o dicen: “Hoy he aprendido algo”.

P. ¿Su opinión es recogida de forma sistemática?

R. Sí. Después de la clase de demostración, evalúan al aspirante de uno a cuatro. Uno significa: “No puede quedarse”. Y 4: “No dejen que se vaya sin contratarlo”. El proceso de selección tiene otros elementos. El aspirante interviene en la junta de profesores. Los docentes dan su opinión. Y la directora o el director va recogiendo todos esos feedbacks. Pero la voz de los alumnos es superimportante porque son ellos los que van a tener a ese profesor. Y cuando tienes a un profesor al que no le interesas, es mucho más difícil aprender. Tenemos que desarrollar escuelas donde los estudiantes sientan que sus maestros los ven.

P. ¿Qué es el éxito educativo?

R. Para mí es poder crear seres humanos decentes.

P. ¿La administración de Donald Trump ha declarado una especie de guerra a las universidades que no se han plegado a sus planteamientos. ¿Está presionando también al sistema escolar?

R. Es un momento muy difícil para el conjunto del país porque existe el deseo de controlar y censurar lo que los estudiantes aprenden. Principios como la diversidad y la equidad están siendo atacados, y ambos forman parte de lo que nosotros somos como organización. Y se plantean retiradas de fondos a las escuelas públicas [en EE UU las escuelas concertadas (charter schools) también entran en dicha categoría] que defienden una filosofía como la nuestra. En nuestro caso, estamos protegidos porque el Estado de California tiene un gobernador [Gavin Newsom] y un secretario de Educación [Tony Thurmond] muy progresistas. Pero en Estados como Texas, Florida o Tenessee está habiendo problemas.

P. ¿Cómo ve la política migratoria que ha adoptado su país?

R. Me preocupa mucho. Fue una de las razones por las que acepté el puesto, Veía a qué nos íbamos a enfrentar. En San Diego hay mucha población latina e inmigrante. En la Junta de Educación de la que formo parte aprobamos una resolución que dice que los agentes federales no pueden entrar en nuestras escuelas [a detener a inmigrantes en situación irregular]. También colaboramos dando recursos a nuestras comunidades, para que sepan cuáles son sus derechos y qué pueden hacer cuando se enfrenten a esas situaciones.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News