A NEW study has revealed that something as simple as going for a daily walk could dramatically extend your life – by up to a decade.

The research, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, shows that people who walk regularly, even at a moderate pace, could significantly boost their life expectancy compared to those who lead sedentary lifestyles. 

In some cases, the increase in lifespan could be as much as 10 or 11 years.

READ MORE: Three signs your heart health is at risk, according to leading Spanish doctor

The findings are the result of a detailed analysis using data from the US National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey and mortality records from the National Centre for Health Statistics. 

Researchers focused on adults over the age of 40 and used device-measured physical activity to evaluate its long-term health impact.

Their model found that if everyone were as active as the most physically engaged 25% of the population – those walking nearly three hours a day at around five km/hour – life expectancy could rise to 84 years on average. 

That’s a gain of over five years compared to current population norms, and in some lower activity groups, benefits may be even greater.

One striking finding revealed that individuals in the lowest quartile of activity could gain around six extra hours of life expectancy for every additional hour of walking they do.

Even those walking just under two hours a day – around 111 minutes – could gain up to 11 years of life, researchers estimated.

But the researchers were keen to point out that exercise is only one piece of the puzzle.

A well-rounded lifestyle, including a balanced diet, sufficient sleep, and effective stress management, plays a complementary role in achieving healthy ageing.

The authors call for greater investment in policies and environments that promote physical activity, noting that boosting physical activity levels across the population could translate into substantial gains in national life expectancy.

The takeaway is clear: walking might be the simplest path to a longer, healthier life.

With the death of Pope Francis, people in Rome are already beginning to think about his successor. These are frenetic and uncertain days in the Vatican — a time of mixed grief and the urgency of thinking about the future, all set against an extraordinarily complex global backdrop and within a deeply divided Church. The first congregation of cardinals — the assembly that convenes after the death of the Pontiff — will take place this Tuesday with those already in Rome. This marks the beginning of both formal and informal discussions among them as they search for a new Pope.

Early lists of potential papal candidates are already circulating, both within Vatican circles and in the Italian and international media. These lists are part of the maneuvers underway to promote certain names. These are usually confusing days, where rumors abound, but what stands out so far is that the Italian press has remained notably silent on the subject — something that was commonplace during the final years of John Paul II. This silence reflects the deep uncertainty about the direction the Church may now take in what will be a conclave more numerous and international than ever before: 135 cardinals from 71 countries, compared to 115 electors in 2005 and 2013 from 52 and 48 countries, respectively. In other words, the Sistine Chapel will be filled with unfamiliar faces, both outside the doors and within, and some of them do not even speak Italian.

Strong internal division makes the situation even more challenging. As has always been the case, a reformist faction of the Church, more aligned with Pope Francis, seeks to continue his path, while a more conservative faction, which has fiercely opposed his decisions in recent years, aims for a retreat. Given the intensity of this clash in recent years, there is now a real concern within the Holy See about something that did not exist in previous conclaves — at least not on this scale: disinformation campaigns and fake news designed to influence the election of the Pope, with hoaxes spreading on social media, aiming to discredit candidates who are undesirable to certain sectors. This will be something to watch in the coming days.

The task of shifting votes and organizing the conclave typically falls to the so-called “great electors” — cardinals who do not expect to be elected themselves but who gather support and are respected figures who can steer the trends. On the conservative side, there are figures such as Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York, and the former Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith, Gerhard Ludwig Müller.

On the more progressive side, there are influential cardinals close to Pope Francis, such as Jean-Claude Hollerich of Luxembourg, the general rapporteur of the Synod. However, at 66, Hollerich is considered too young, as it would likely result in a pontificate that could last for many years. Another prominent figure is the Canadian Michael Czerny, Prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, who is a Jesuit. However, it seems unlikely that the Church will choose another pope from this order.

The key factor to remember is that 90 votes — two-thirds of the 135 cardinals entering the conclave — are required to elect the new pope. A faction with some support isn’t enough; it must be a truly consensual decision. Many who disagree must be convinced of a shared vision, where strength and personal magnetism also play a role. However, unlike previous conclaves, there are no clear frontrunners, and this one is expected to be more laborious and prolonged.

In 2005, with four votes, and in 2013, with five, the process lasted only 24 hours. This time, it could resemble the conclave of October 1978, which took eight votes and resulted in the election of an unknown, John Paul II. It is likely that surprises will emerge once again. Pope Francis has certainly structured this conclave to encourage such outcomes. He has appointed 79% of the cardinals, often selecting lesser-known figures — profiles that reflect the Church he has sought to shape: one that is closer to the people and the margins of society.

At present, it is possible to draw up a list of at least 15 potential papal candidates. To begin with, despite this being a conclave that is no longer Eurocentric, the belief that the pope must come from Italy still persists, as it has for centuries, though much of the Church finds it impossible to return to that tradition. Italy boasts the largest group of cardinals, 17 in total, and this carries weight.

Three Italian cardinals are currently being mentioned as possible contenders. One of them is Pietro Parolin, 70, the current Secretary of State. This position is typically associated with papal candidates due to the experience it offers in governance and as a symbol of continuity — if that is the goal, rather than a change. However, despite his experience, Parolin has little pastoral experience and has alienated some sectors due to the balancing act he has had to navigate in recent years.

The second Italian in the running is Matteo Zuppi, 69, Archbishop of Bologna and president of the Italian bishops’ conference. He is aligned with Pope Francis and is a member of the Sant’Egidio community, known for its work in international conflict mediation and its strong social vocation. Another contender is the Patriarch of the Holy Land, the Franciscan Pierbattista Pizzaballa. Well-known in the media for his role in the Middle East, Pizzaballa is highly regarded, but he faces a disadvantage due to his age — 59 — at a time when a transitional solution might be preferred.

Another name that has frequently emerged in recent years — he was a papal candidate in 2013 — is 67-year-old Filipino Luis Antonio Gokim Tagle, whose mother is Chinese. He would be the first Asian pope, a possible option if Francis, the first pontiff from the Americas, is to be followed by a pope from outside the Western hemisphere. However, his popularity has waned due to his controversial management of the charity organization Caritas International.

In Asia, two other names often come up. The first is Charles Bo, Archbishop of Yangon in Myanmar. Bo is distinguished for his defense of human rights in a country under military rule and has presided over the Federation of Asian Episcopal Conferences for the past six years.

The second potential candidate is Malcolm Ranjith from Sri Lanka, Archbishop of Colombo, who previously served as secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship. At 77, Ranjith brings a wealth of experience, making him a candidate for a short papacy — potentially serving as a temporary counterbalance to Pope Francis. He is considered part of the more traditionalist camp, which could hinder consensus.

The same applies to another frequently mentioned name, Robert Sarah of Guinea, who has openly clashed with Pope Francis in recent years, positioning himself further on the conservative side.

The most frequently discussed African candidate is Fridolin Ambongo Besungu, Archbishop of Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. A Franciscan, Ambongo is well-regarded by conservatives and has led the opposition to the blessing of same-sex unions.

After Pope Francis became the first pontiff from the Americas, there have not been many standout names in the continent. However, one candidate who straddles both halves of the continent is Robert Francis Prevost, 69, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops. He is American but has spent nearly his entire life in Peru. His candidacy would send a strong signal in facing the complex challenges of the Donald Trump era, particularly as the U.S. Church is at odds with him. The ultraconservative movement in the United States is eager to politically co-opt the Christian message, framing it as a crusade between good and evil.

Following the election of Pope Francis, the first non-European pope since Gregory III (who was born in Syria in the 8th century), leaving Europe now appears to be a clear direction. However, there are still candidates from the Old Continent. The most unusual among them is Anders Arborelius, 75, Bishop of Stockholm. A Carmelite who was raised Lutheran and later converted to Catholicism, he combines social openness with pastoral rigor. Another potential candidate is Peter Erdo, 72, Archbishop of Budapest. Born under Communism, he is a cultured man and a leading figure in the conservative camp in recent years.

Also in the running is Jean-Marc Aveline, 66, Archbishop of Marseille. A seasoned bishop with a strong presence among the socially underprivileged, a group emphasized by Pope Francis, Aveline is an expert in interreligious dialogue. However, his age suggests that he could serve a lengthy papacy.

On the conservative side, one respected figure is Willem Jacobus Eijk, 71, Archbishop of Utrecht, who remains faithful to the line of Benedict XVI. Another candidate is José Tolentino de Mendonça, a 66-year-old Portuguese cardinal. Prefect of the Dicastery for Culture and Education, a poet and theologian, he has been steadily rising within the Curia and is known for his intellectual approach, his attention to the poor, and his connection to Africa — having spent his childhood in Angola. Finally, Mario Grech, 68, from Malta, has served as Pope Francis’s right-hand man in the synodal process as Secretary General.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Los mercados europeos regresan a la actividad tras el parón de Semana Santa en un ambiente de nerviosismo. Los riesgos geopolíticos y las tensiones comerciales siguen al alza, las negociaciones del Gobierno de Washington con sus socios para llegar a acuerdos sobre aranceles no cuajan. Y para mayor intranquilidad, la Administración de Donald Trump arremete contra la Reserva Federal, y en concreto contra su presidente, Jerome Powell, minando la confianza en la institución e intentando forzar una rebaja de tipos de interés y condicionar sus decisiones futuras en materia de política monetaria. Una crisis de credibilidad es caldo de cultivo para que los inversores huyan de los activos estadounidenses: el dólar sigue en zona de mínimos de tres años contra el euro y se mantienen las ventas de deuda de EE UU a largo plazo. El efecto arrastre se llevó por delante ayer a los índices de Wall Street. El oro renueva máximos históricos, tocando los 3.500 dólares por onza, mientras otros activos que se consideran seguros, como el yen japonés y el franco suizo, mantienen su papel como refugio donde protegerse de las ideas y venidas de los mercados.

Las Bolsas europeas logran contener este pesimismo y tras abrir con recortes, las caídas se moderan. En concreto, el Ibex 35 cotiza en tablas y se mueve en torno a los 12.840 puntos. Dentro del selectivo, los valores más alcistas son Colonial, Iberdrola y Santander, que suben más del 1%. Al otro lado, el mayor descenso es para Aena, que pierde un 4,5%. Por su parte, CaixaBank y Unicaja, le siguen, con caídas respectivas del 2,8% y 2,6%.

No son amigos los inversores de situaciones de incertidumbre como la que se vive en las últimas semanas, desde que Trump arrancó su andanada arancelaria, a comienzos de abril. Si bien el mandatario, forzado por los mercados, otorgó una tregua para iniciar conversaciones con otros países, los operadores no ven que el camino sea fácil: ante las dudas, mejor guardar la ropa. Las Bolsas europeas llevan desde el jueves sin operar, mientras los principales índices estadounidenses, el S&P 500, el Dow Jones y el Nasdaq, cerraron ayer con caídas de más del 2%. A pesar de este ambiente enrarecido, en Europa los operadores mantienen la calma. Mientras, el dólar, que caía de madrugada frente al euro hasta su nivel más bajo desde 2022, modera estos descensos y cotiza en tablas.

Trump exacerbó ayer la agitación de los operadores de EE UU con nuevas críticas al presidente de la Fed, que se suman a las amenazas que ya lanzó la semana pasada. En una publicación en su red Truth Social, el mandatario calificó ayer de “perdedor” a Powell y le exigió que bajara los tipos de interés “YA” o se arriesgaba a una desaceleración económica. La arremetida de Trump se produce después de que el responsable del banco central afirmara la semana pasada que la institución puede ser paciente al determinar las medidas de política monetaria, y que no se deben bajar los tipos de interés hasta que esté más claro que los planes arancelarios no avivarán la inflación.

El foco principal de nerviosismo se mantiene en el ámbito comercial y en el escaso avance de las negociaciones para llegar acuerdos sobre aranceles. “Cada día que no se alcanzan acuerdos para proporcionar algún alivio, se genera nueva ansiedad”, señala a Reuters Eric Kuby, director de inversiones de la gestora North Star Investment Management. Este analista cita además el “terrible estancamiento” entre Trump y Powell, que fomenta la “preocupación de que se tome algún tipo de medida para reemplazar a Powell, lo que generaría un verdadero pánico en el dólar”.

Por su parte, desde MacroYield señalan que “en los últimos días, según la Casa Blanca, se ha avanzado en las negociaciones comerciales con la UE, Japón y la India, pero el sentimiento inversor se mantiene muy negativo. El índice de Avaricia/Miedo calculado por la CNN a partir de distintos indicadores técnicos, se mantiene en zona de extremo miedo, aunque se ha moderado este miedo desde principios de abril”.

En este entorno, algunos activos considerados más seguros por los inversores -un papel que antes ocupaba el dólar pero que ha perdido- se mantienen al alza. Entre estos activos refugio, el oro sigue en máximo histórico: la onza del metal precioso sube este martes un 2% y se coloca en 3.490 dólares.

También el franco suizo y el yen siguen fuertes frente al dólar. El dólar está cerca del mínimo en una década frente a la moneda suiza y en su nivel más bajo en siete meses contra la japonesa. “Cuanto más se prolongue la especulación sobre la independencia de la política monetaria estadounidense, mayor será el riesgo de caída del dólar”, señala Joseph Capurso, director de economía internacional y sostenible del Commonwealth Bank of Australia. “Podría ser necesaria otra ola de ventas en el mercado de bonos del gobierno estadounidense o en el mercado de valores estadounidense para animar al presidente Trump a abstenerse de tales comentarios”, añade.

También la deuda de EE UU recibe más presión, y las ventas se ceban, en especial el bono a 10 años. Los precios de estos títulos de renta fija caen y la rentabilidad -es decir, el retorno que obtiene el inversor si se queda el bono hasta el vencimiento y que se mueve a la inversa del precio- sube al 4,432%. Aumenta asimismo el rendimiento de los plazos más cortos, y el bono a 2 años cotiza en el 3,779%.

En Asia, los índices registran también descensos moderados o leves subidas. El Nikkei de Tokio baja un 0,14% al cierre y el Hang Seng de Hong Kong, que ayer no operó, sube un 0,2%. El índice compuesto de Shanghai gana un 0,25%. En un nuevo episodio, las tensiones comerciales, China advirtió a los países que negocian con Estados Unidos que el acuerdo que alcance no perjudique a Pekín, intensificando su discurso de enfrentamiento en la guerra comercial entre las dos mayores economías del mundo.

Bolsas – Divisas – Deuda – Tipos de interés – Materias primas