Connect with us

%

Spain Hits Uber Eats With €110m Bill

Published

on

spain-hits-uber-eats-with-e110m-bill

Uber Eats rider delivering food on a Spanish street Credit : O.Kemppainen, Shutterstock

Spain is demanding €110 million from Uber Eats after labour inspectors ruled that around 60,000 delivery riders were wrongly treated as self-employed instead of employees. The claim covers unpaid Social Security contributions between 2022 and 2026, and more penalties could still follow.

For many people working in Spain – including foreign residents relying on delivery apps – this case brings into focus a question that often gets overlooked: are you really self-employed, or should you be classed as an employee?

Why the government is asking for €110 million

The case comes after an investigation by Spain’s Labour Inspectorate, which began last summer. After reviewing how riders worked, inspectors concluded that many of them were operating under conditions closer to employment than freelance work.

That distinction matters in Spain.

If you’re self-employed (autónomo), you’re responsible for your own Social Security payments, taxes and protections. If you’re an employee, those responsibilities shift – and you gain rights like paid leave, sick pay and clearer legal protection.

According to the inspectors, many Uber Eats riders were labelled as self-employed while working in a way that suggested otherwise. That’s why the government is now claiming €110 million in unpaid Social Security contributions.

On top of that, an additional fine is expected, although the exact amount hasn’t been confirmed yet.

What’s already happening to riders

This isn’t just a legal dispute on paper – it’s already affecting workers.

Thousands of riders have reportedly received messages from Spain’s Social Security system informing them that they have been registered as employees for the periods when they were working as freelancers.

In practical terms, that means their employment status is being corrected retroactively.

For some, that could have implications for contributions, benefits or future pension rights.

What Uber Eats says – and what has changed

Uber Eats says it is cooperating with the process and insists it is committed to complying with Spanish law. The company has also been adjusting how it operates in Spain.

Earlier this year, Uber Eats announced it would stop working with self-employed riders altogether. Instead, deliveries would continue through subcontracted companies, where riders are hired as employees.

So while the legal case looks at the past, the business model is already shifting.

This brings Uber Eats more in line with what has been happening across the sector.

Glovo, for example, moved towards an employment-based model after facing legal pressure, while Just Eat has long used directly employed riders.

What this means for people working in Spain

For many foreigners living in Spain, delivery platforms are often one of the first ways to find work in Spain. It’s relatively accessible, flexible, and doesn’t always require perfect Spanish.

But this case shows that the setup isn’t always as straightforward as it seems.

Being registered as autónomo can come with costs and responsibilities that aren’t always clear at the start:

  • monthly Social Security payments
  • handling your own taxes
  • fewer employment protections

If the job functions more like standard employment – fixed conditions, limited independence – then the classification can be questioned.

That’s exactly what has happened here.

For foreign workers, especially those new to Spain, it’s a reminder to look closely at how a job is structured – not just what it’s called.

A longer shift already underway in Spain

Spain introduced the so-called “Rider Law” a few years ago to address this exact issue. The idea was to ensure that delivery riders working through platforms are treated as employees where appropriate.

But putting that into practice has taken time, and not all companies adapted in the same way.

This latest move suggests that authorities are still reviewing how the rules are applied – and are willing to act when they believe companies haven’t followed them properly.

What happens next

The €110 million claim is significant, but it may not be the final figure. Additional penalties are still being considered, and the case could take time to fully resolve.

In the meantime, the impact is already being felt – both by the company and by thousands of workers whose status is being reassessed.

For anyone working – or thinking of working – in the gig economy in Spain, the message is becoming clearer: how your job is classified matters, and it can change.

And sometimes, that change comes years after the work has already been done.

%

UK Approves Lifetime Tobacco Ban For Everyone Born After 2008

Published

on

uk-approves-lifetime-tobacco-ban-for-everyone-born-after-2008

The policy is intended to reduce the number of people who start smoking at a young age. Photo credit: Richard Bradford/Shutterstock

The United Kingdom is set to introduce a permanent ban on the sale of tobacco to everyone born on or after  January 1 2009, after Parliament approved one of the most significant anti-smoking measures in recent decades. The proposal is contained in the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which has passed both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The legislation is now awaiting Royal Assent, the final formal stage before becoming law.

If enacted, the measure will not ban smoking itself. Instead, it will make it unlawful for retailers to sell tobacco products to anyone in the affected age group at any point in their lives.

How the system will work

Rather than setting a single new minimum age, the law creates a rolling age limit that increases each year. At present, the legal age for buying tobacco in the UK is 18. Under the new system, that threshold will continue to rise by one year annually for those born from 2009 onwards.

This means adults who can already legally buy tobacco will keep that right. However, someone born in 2009 or later would never reach an age at which tobacco sales become lawful for them. The policy applies to cigarettes and other tobacco products covered by existing age-of-sale laws.

Parliamentary approval

The bill has been debated over several stages in both Houses of Parliament. Supporters argued that smoking remains one of the leading causes of preventable illness and death, while opponents raised questions about enforcement, personal choice and the long-term practicality of a generational sales ban.

Despite those objections, the legislation secured enough support to pass through both chambers.

Once Royal Assent is granted, ministers will be able to bring the new rules into force through secondary legislation and implementation guidance.

Why the government is introducing it

The policy is intended to reduce the number of people who start smoking at a young age and lower long-term demand for tobacco. Successive governments have sought to reduce smoking rates through taxation, advertising restrictions, standardised packaging, public health campaigns and indoor smoking bans.

The new measure goes further by attempting to prevent future generations from legally accessing tobacco products at all.Ministers have described the policy as part of a long-term public health strategy aimed at reducing smoking-related disease and pressure on health services.

What it means for retailers

Shops that sell tobacco will need to continue checking ages, but over time the system will become more complex because the legal age will no longer be fixed at 18.

Instead, eligibility will depend on a customer’s date of birth. Retailers are expected to receive updated guidance on age verification and enforcement once the law is formally enacted. Existing penalties for unlawful tobacco sales may also apply to businesses that breach the new rules.

Wider measures in the bill

The legislation also includes powers to regulate vaping and nicotine products. These provisions allow ministers to introduce future rules covering areas such as flavours, packaging, product displays and restrictions in certain public places. Specific measures would require further regulations before taking effect.

The inclusion of vaping controls reflects concern among policymakers about youth uptake of nicotine products, even as vaping is also used by some adults as an alternative to smoking.

Public debate

The proposal has attracted support from many health organisations, which argue that preventing young people from starting to smoke is more effective than trying to help established smokers quit later in life.

Critics, however, have questioned whether the law creates different rights for adults based solely on year of birth. Others have argued that enforcement may become harder over time if legal and illegal age groups exist side by side. There has also been debate over whether restrictions on legal sales could increase the illicit tobacco market, though the long-term effect remains uncertain.

International significance

The UK is among the first major countries to legislate for a permanent generational ban on tobacco sales. Similar proposals have been discussed elsewhere, but few have advanced as far through the legislative process.

Public health campaigners are likely to watch implementation closely, particularly whether the measure leads to lower smoking uptake among younger age groups.

What happens next

The final step is Royal Assent, after which the bill will become law. The government will then set commencement dates and publish enforcement details.

If implemented as planned, people born on or after 1 January 2009 will never be able to legally buy tobacco in the United Kingdom, marking a major change in the country’s approach to smoking policy.

Continue Reading

%

Cinema Chain In Spain Fined €45,000 For Banning Outside Food And Drink

Published

on

cinema-chain-in-spain-fined-e45,000-for-banning-outside-food-and-drink

Consumer groups have argued that cinemas are not primarily food businesses. Photo credit: Capturing Images/Shutterstock

A cinema chain in Algeciras has been fined €45,000 for preventing customers from entering screening rooms with food and drink bought outside the venue, according to reports published on Monday. The sanction was imposed on Yelmo Cines by the Territorial Delegation of Health and Consumer Affairs of the Junta de Andalucía in Cádiz after complaints supported by consumer organisation FACUA. The case concerns the company’s policy of restricting access to customers carrying products purchased elsewhere.

According to the published resolution, the offence was classified as serious under Andalucían consumer protection rules. In the region, serious infringements can carry financial penalties ranging from €10,001 to €100,000.

Basis of the complaint

The dispute centres on whether a cinema whose principal activity is film exhibition can stop customers bringing in food and drink from outside when ticket holders have already paid for entry.

Consumer groups have argued that cinemas are not primarily food businesses and therefore cannot automatically require visitors to buy refreshments on site as a condition of access. They say blanket bans on outside items may place unfair limits on consumer choice. FACUA said it had backed complaints against the practice in several parts of Spain, arguing that customers should be free to decide where they buy snacks and drinks unless there are specific safety or hygiene grounds that justify restrictions.

Previous sanctions

Reports state this is the fourth penalty issued against the Yelmo cine chain over the same issue. Earlier fines cited in coverage include €25,000 in Almería, €12,000 in Sevilla, and €30,000 imposed by the Basque consumer authority Kontsumobide. Those cases also related to restrictions on customers carrying food or drink purchased outside the cinema.

The latest sanction in Algeciras is the highest of the reported fines linked to the practice.

Consumer law background

Spanish consumer law allows regional authorities to investigate business practices and issue penalties where rules are found to have been breached. Enforcement is handled by autonomous communities, meaning cases are decided by regional bodies rather than a single national regulator.

The Algeciras case was handled by the Andalucian administration through its provincial consumer authority in Cádiz. The classification of the offence as serious indicates the authority considered the conduct to go beyond a minor administrative issue, although the published reports do not detail whether aggravating factors were taken into account when setting the amount.

Position of cinemas

Most cinemas sell food and drink as an additional source of income, with popcorn, sweets and beverages forming part of their commercial offer. Some venues have rules limiting what can be taken into screening rooms, particularly where alcohol, hot food or glass containers are concerned. The issue in this case, however, concerns a general ban on products bought elsewhere rather than restrictions linked to safety or disturbance.

No wider industry response had been reported at the time of publication regarding whether operators would review admission policies following the latest fine.

Wider significance

The decision is likely to attract attention beyond Algeciras because similar policies are common in cinemas in Spain and other countries. The case may encourage further complaints from customers or prompt other regional authorities to review existing rules where bans are in place.

It also highlights the role of consumer organisations in bringing complaints that lead to regulatory action. FACUA has previously campaigned on pricing, contract terms and access conditions across several sectors.

What happens next

It was not immediately clear from published reports whether the fine would be appealed. Companies subject to administrative sanctions in Spain can usually challenge decisions through internal procedures and, if necessary, through the courts. Unless overturned or reduced, the penalty adds to a growing number of sanctions issued over the same practice.

For cinema-goers, the ruling does not automatically create a nationwide rule applying to every venue, as enforcement decisions are taken case by case and under regional powers. However, it reinforces the view of several consumer authorities that blanket bans on outside food and drink may breach consumer protection rules when the main service being sold is admission to watch a film. The case is one of the clearest recent examples of regulators intervening in cinema admission policies and may shape how operators approach food and drink rules in future.

Continue Reading

%

Orihuela To Host 37th Regional School Theatre Showcase

Published

on

orihuela-to-host-37th-regional-school-theatre-showcase

Orihuela hosts 37th school theatre showcase with 27 performances. Photo Credit: Orihuela Town Hall

ORIHUELA is preparing to host the 37th edition of the Regional School Theatre Showcase, which this year will feature 27 special performances at the Circus Theatre. The event, which for nearly four decades has brought together students from educational centres all over the Vega Baja region, has been firmly established as a source of local pride and unites the students with a love for theatre.

A programme to celebrate theatre in Orihuela

The programme, which will take place from May 5 to May 28, includes a wide variety of styles and stage productions, from classical theatre to contemporary and innovative works. The project includes performances of famous works, including:

  • Lost in Translation, Toc-Toc, The Gods or Cinderella (IES Tháder)
  • Trash TV (IES Mare Nostrum)
  • Punch and Judy (Reverse Version) (IES Santiago Grisolía)
  • Scarlet Theorem (MUDIC Jesús Carnicer)
  • The Magic of Emotions, The Wizard of Oz, Shrek, Cantar Mio Cid or The Play That Goes Wrong (Jesús María San Agustín)
  • Cinderella Who Didn’t Expect a Prince (CEIP San Bartolomé)
  • The Pied Piper of Hamelin, Saint George and the Dragon, Beauty and the Beast or Enchantment (Oratorio Festivo)
  • Peter Pan Musical (Santo Domingo)
  • The World Upside Down or The Darlings (Virgen de Montserrate de Torremendo)

The event fosters essential values including camaraderie, teamwork, and creativity. The project allows students to enter the world of art and theatre, as well as develop important communicative skills and, above all, foster and facilitate group work among them.

Admission will be free for all audiences, though the Orihuela Department of Education recommends making a reservation in advance through the Teatro Circo to help organize attendance.

With this project, the students’ hard work onstage will reflect the talent, effort, and commitment of schools throughout the Vega Baja region, and re-affirm Orihuela’s place as a cultural and artistic hotspot on the Costa.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News