Connect with us

Colombia

Toby Muse, Author: ‘We Live In A World That Pablo Escobar Could Never Have Imagined’

Published

on

toby-muse,-author:-‘we-live-in-a-world-that-pablo-escobar-could-never-have-imagined’

British-American writer and journalist Toby Muse has immersed himself in the underworld of drugs for more than 15 years. He has infiltrated narcotics labs and traveled through guerrilla camps in the Colombian jungle, in order to understand the aspirations and deprivations that drive thousands of people into the trafficking networks. Through his work, the 50-year-old – born in Chichester, United Kingdom – dismantles the failed promises of the war on drugs, while offering a stark portrait of the global cocaine empire.

“I didn’t want to tell the same old story,” Muse explains, via video call from Bogotá. “I think the emotions are what tells the real story. And I wanted to do a book about the emotions of cocaine, about the feelings of cocaine. What does the novia (girlfriend) of a Sicario feel? What does the widow of a narco [feel]?” The result was Kilo: Life and Death Inside the Secret World of the Cocaine Cartels (2021). Six years after its initial publication, the book is now also out in Spanish.

Drug lords fall and new bosses emerge. Governments come and go. And blood stains the streets red in Sinaloa and Medellín. But no matter what, cocaine remains universal. It corrupts politicians and police officers, fuels the insatiable appetite of Wall Street stockbrokers and London nightclubs, moves billions through European ports and confronts countries like Ecuador with an abyss that – until just a few years ago – was unimaginable. These are compelling reasons to return to the pages of Kilo, which narrates the journey of a silent protagonist: a bundle of cocaine. The narrative begins with its departure from the impoverished fields of Colombia, until it reaches the final consumers.

Question. The war on drugs has been going on for more than five decades. And yet, there’s more cocaine than ever. How did we get to this point?

Answer. We’re in the golden age of cocaine right now. Pablo Escobar couldn’t imagine this much cocaine. Production is concentrated in three countries: Colombia, Bolivia and Peru. Colombia, for about the last 10 to 12 years, has broken a new record every year.

One of the main reasons behind this is the peace process with the FARC in 2016. In many of the guerrilla-controlled territories, there were coca crops. When the FARC handed over their weapons, the deal was that the government would take those territories and establish law and order in return. But the government simply didn’t do it. It couldn’t. That’s why I believe — and I know many people don’t like to hear this — that the peace process was a failure. It wasn’t supposed to just mean peace between the government and the FARC, but rather peace for everyone in Colombia. And that, clearly, didn’t happen.

When the FARC laid down their weapons and gave the territory over, all of the other illegal groups flooded into the zones to take over [coca leaf production], and demanding that the campesinos (the peasants) plant more.

Every time I speak to the cocaleros, [I’m surprised by] the amount of them who are sick of the business. They want out. They hate the business now, because it doesn’t even bring them that much money. And now they have to live under the law of these armed groups. And this is what happens, because cocaine always brings violence. If you grow coffee, you don’t have to live with violence. But with cocaine, violence is always there. If the government were to present them with a coherent plan, an alternative, I’m sure they would stop cultivating coca.

I think it’s relevant that the world asks Colombia why it’s producing so much cocaine. It’s a completely legitimate question. But Colombia can also ask the rest of the world: “Why are you consuming so much cocaine?” Colombia produces cocaine because richer countries consume [it]. And yet, we don’t even talk about consumption. In England, who talks about why we consume cocaine? No one. [And] London is one of the centers of cocaine consumption. I never hear a Londoner ask that question

Q. The war on drugs has also created its heroes and villains. Do you think that Colombia is being treated as a scapegoat?

A. Yes, absolutely. It takes two to tango. Colombia produces drugs because people in the United States, which is the biggest market, consume drugs. Europe consumes drugs. Cocaine is capitalism: it’s [now scoping] out new markets in Asia.

Colombia is always portrayed as the villain. There’s a racist component, possibly, in how South Americans are viewed. And I think it’s unfortunate, because we’re all responsible for this. But I also think that there’s a bit of a pendulum swing. Sometimes, the end users are blamed for everything… and I don’t agree with that, either. When we think about the Prohibition years in the 1920s and 1930s, the real villains weren’t the people having a drink, but those who created these absurd laws.

Valle del Guamuez

Q. Who pays the highest price in this war?

A. Colombia has this never-ending supply of young men, [and] also young women, to a lesser degree, who are thrown to the frontlines to just die in this pointless war machine where, you know, they’re trained as a sicario (an assassin) at 15 or 16. They don’t live to be 25. It’s an extraordinarily nihilistic life. It’s fast money. [You say to yourself], “I want an actress girlfriend and I will never see 30.” In the best case scenario, [a cartel member] might leave some money behind for their wives or children.

But I think we all pay. If you look at the data in the United States, more than 100,000 people died from overdoses in a single year. That’s more than [all the Americans who] died in Iraq and Afghanistan. The police are also getting even greater power to snoop, because of drug policy-related laws. I think that the war on drugs does none of us any good.

Q. Are governments and politicians primarily responsible for this failure?

A. We all share some of the responsibility. We keep implementing the same policies… and that hasn’t been a very smart decision. But I think we also just don’t know what to do. We’re stuck in this thing where the war on drugs is obviously not working, but I don’t think we’re ready for legalization, either. So, we just keep doing the same thing over and over again. Politicians don’t do anything until they’re pressured. But certainly no one is pressuring Donald Trump to stop the war on drugs in South America. No, in fact, he’s escalating the war on drugs here in this region.

Q. What effect has Trump’s return to the White House had on the fight against the cartels?

A. There is immense pressure on Latin American governments. In the case of Mexico, it’s very clear that he’s asking the authorities to do more. Ecuador, on the other hand, seems much more inclined to accept U.S. resources in its fight against the cartels and criminal gangs. We’ll have to see what comes of that. Trump promised the same for Colombia… but that’s going to depend on who wins the presidential election that’s coming up.

Then, you have Venezuela. Venezuela is an interesting question, because the whole thing was framed in the terms of the war on drugs. You saw this merging of the war on terror and the war on drugs in Venezuela. And [the Trump administration] was talking about the Cartel de los Soles (the Cartel of the Suns). It was everywhere. Then, [Trump] took Venezuela, he took Maduro. And now, America’s basically helping to run Venezuela. And we never hear anything more about this cartel. [This isn’t meant to] minimize [that] Venezuela had clearly become an important transit point for cocaine, especially on its way to Europe. And then, you have the question of these bombings, of these boats – if every one of these boats [was actually] carrying cocaine. That’s the first question to ask. And we just don’t have an answer to that. But even if they were, you cannot just kill someone who is carrying out an illegal act. [The proper thing to do is] arrest them. You put them in front of a court. They [need to be] judged to be guilty.

Q. Cocaine usage has skyrocketed in Europe. Is it possible that, in the future, the violence will reach the same levels as in Latin America?

A. No, not the same levels, but I think a wave of violence [is coming in] Europe. Cocaine always follows a cycle. At the beginning, it’s always a golden age. And there’s no reason to fight, because everyone’s making enough money. [But] then, there comes a moment when the [cartels] get tired of sharing. They’re now so powerful: they can recruit more men and women, they can buy better guns. And then, they’re like, why are we sharing?

I think Europe is at the stage now where everyone’s making so much money. Could you imagine how much those mafias in Barcelona, Madrid [and] London are making? What are they doing with their money? [Well], they’re becoming stronger. You can see the situation in Rotterdam is incredibly out of control: I think the real level of corruption in those port systems is through the roof. You can see that there are teenage sicarios in places like Marseille. You’ve got hardened fighters coming out of Eastern Europe, places like Ukraine and Russia. You’ve got the recipe for something very, very, very ugly to happen. This is what I fear… and Europe is completely [unprepared] for this.

I think Europe’s going to have this moment when it’s going to wake up and say, “we let this problem get far too big.”

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Colombia

‘Macondo York’: The Gaze Of A García Márquez Overwhelmed By The Big Apple

Published

on

‘macondo-york’:-the-gaze-of-a-garcia-marquez-overwhelmed-by-the-big-apple

Few associate Gabriel García Márquez with the asphalt jungle of New York. Collective memory places the Nobel Prize-winner in the heat of Mexico, the hustle and bustle of Barranquilla or the elegance of Barcelona. But for Colombian graphic designer and author Iván Onatra, the Big Apple was a crucial — and at times, forgotten — stage in the scribe’s life. García Márquez’s time in the city that never sleeps takes on new life in Onatra’s bilingual design book Macondo York, in which he explores the writer’s love-hate relationship that lasted for six months, while he worked as a journalist for the Prensa Latina news agency.

It was a period marked by frustration, which finally led him to leave the city for Mexico. According to Onatra, the trip was a definitive bridge: five years after the exhausting experiment in New York, García Márquez would publish One Hundred Years of Solitude, his masterpiece and perennial bestseller. In Onatra’s view, there is a deep connection between these two worlds. “Gabo saw New York’s magical realism,” and, though the city overwhelmed him, it was a fundamental seed to his creative process.

Macondo York is not a conventional photo book. Onatra, who has lived between New York and Colombia for more than a decade, describes the project as a “comprehensive graphic design approach” that blends literature, history and typography. The book’s visual origin stems from a “typographical safari” Onatra carried out in Brooklyn in 2014, which led him to discover how “the streets are alive.” With his camera, he captured not landscapes, but ephemeral urban messaging: signs, sewers and shop windows that are the true face of New York.

The idea for the book came out of a Gabo Foundation workshop in New York. After a series of mockups, Onatra designed the book’s title and cover, and it struck him that the project had potential. He used his images — capturing graffiti, signs and shop lettering — to tell the story of García Márquez’s relationship with the city. The result is a beautiful editorial object, a work made to delight lovers of graphic books.

Each page is accompanied by a quote from the author of No One Writes to the Colonel. “New York is the greatest phenomenon of the twentieth century… I find it so overwhelming,” wrote García Márquez. “Always so unequal and always so originally American,” he said.

The book also gathers the author’s own experiences, like the music shops he discovered on 116th Street: “They sell all the old Cuban and Antillean music… You can find real gems.” Or his relationship with the people of the city: “In New York, I start out speaking Spanish, and everyone understands me.”

To avoid using erroneous quotes attributed to the author on the internet, Onatra says he worked with the Gabo Foundation to make sure that every reference was verified. The book opens with a phrase from García Márquez that sums up the project’s essence: “Photography will be the best witness to history.”

Onatra also has a close relationship with photography. “I have always taken photographs, since I was in high school,” he says. “I never made a living from photography, but I have always had the camera with me. There’s not a moment on one of my trips that I don’t have a camera. And I took a course on typographical safari with the New York School of Visual Arts that consisted of looking for signs around Brooklyn. That’s when I said, ‘Oh, the streets are alive.’ And ever since, I began to take photos in the street without really knowing what they were for. Some day, I said, I’m going to use them.”

A sensory experience

Onatra presented Macondo York at the Centroamérica Cuenta Literary Festival, which featured more than 80 authors and took place in Panama. After the presentation, he tells EL PAÍS that the book’s impact has transcended its pages, leading to large-scale exhibitions in places like Bogotá’s Casa de Nariño and the International Book Fair, where 88 of its panels were presented.

At Hay Festival, the work was transformed into an olfactory and auditory experience, including a special perfume called Limón de Oro (Golden Lemon), and a band that blended New York sounds with atmospheric notes recalling Macondo, the mythic town of One Hundred Years of Solitude.

Its reception among new audiences has been notable. Onatra notes that the combination of two cultural powerhouses — Gabo and New York— creates an added “plus” that attracts even those who are not familiar with the author. The book is bilingual, and its urban aesthetic connects with young people who see design and street art as vital forms of expression.

Onatra says that Macondo York is just the first step of what he calls his “New York trilogy.” He is already working on the next installation, Lorca York, which will explore the homes of Spanish poet Federico García Lorca in the city, set against a graphic grid in “acid green,” continuing his mission to portray New York through the eyes of great, Spanish-speaking writers. His aim is to capture the essence of a project that demonstrates that, even if the street signs shown in the book disappear in a few years, the words of a genius like García Márquez will continue to speak to us.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Continue Reading

America

E

Published

on

e

Please enable JS and disable any ad blocker

Continue Reading

Abelardo de la Espriella

Colombia Chooses Its Next President Amid Renewed Violence

Published

on

colombia-chooses-its-next-president-amid-renewed-violence

Renewed violence — a kind that has never been fully extinguished in Colombia — marks the presidential campaign to choose Gustavo Petro’s successor. In many places, the first-round vote this Sunday will take place under crossfire. Nearly 10 years after the signing of the historic peace accord with the now-defunct FARC guerrilla organization, other armed actors threaten communities and the war still burns, albeit in a more fragmented phase. The humanitarian consequences of the armed conflict have reached “the most serious level of the last decade,” the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) warned this month. Amid that crisis, public security has become one of the main concerns.

That deterioration includes the killing of all kinds of social leaders. Anxiety is rising among the civilian population, which is suffering homicides, disappearances, threats, and forced recruitment in places such as Catatumbo and Arauca on the turbulent border with Venezuela; Cauca, along the Pacific corridor; Nariño and Putumayo, departments bordering Ecuador; and the forested department of Guaviare in the country’s south. Armed groups have also poisoned the presidential elections.

Left-wing Senator Iván Cepeda, Petro’s party colleague and the frontrunner in all polls, takes the stage flanked by bodyguards carrying heavy ballistic shields that never leave his side. His rival, far-right candidate Abelardo de la Espriella, who is fighting to reach the second round alongside Paloma Valencia, the candidate of the more traditional right, often speaks from behind bulletproof glass. All three have reported death threats. In a presidential race that was shaken early on by the assassination of opposition senator and pre-candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay — who died in August last year after a teenage hitman shot him in the head in broad daylight during a rally in Bogotá — violence looms large.

Petro has vigorously defended the claim that “there is no chaos of violence in this government,” arguing mainly that the homicide rate shows a small but sustained decline. But many other indicators show a tangible deterioration, such as extortion, child recruitment, and kidnapping figures. The next president, who will be sworn in on August 7, will inherit a country with more than 27,000 members of organized armed groups and at least 14 active zones of dispute among illegal actors, according to Public Forces estimates cited by the Ideas for Peace Foundation (FIP). Many new recruits are minors.

The map from the Electoral Observation Mission (MOE), another NGO, identifies violence-related risk factors in 339 of the country’s 1,100 municipalities, 126 of which are at extreme risk. Despite the welcome disarmament of the FARC, a disorderly archipelago of armed groups still operates, with more fractured structures in regions where all kinds of illegal economies exist, not just drug trafficking. The exit of the historic guerrilla group left a vacuum that, in the absence of a state response, has been filled by other armed actors more focused on controlling specific territories to exploit illegal economies than on threatening the state. “Colombia today has multiple local-level conflicts,” says Elizabeth Dickinson, deputy director for Latin America at the International Crisis Group. “The dynamics of the violence and the interests of the actors are local, not national.”

A four-year program of total peace — the ambitious but worn policy with which Petro sought to negotiate simultaneously with all groups — has produced few results. Talks with the ELN guerrilla, once the most advanced, remain deadlocked after a violent onslaught more than a year ago in Catatumbo that caused the forced displacement of more than 100,000 people. Even the staunchest supporters of negotiated exits from the conflict say Petro has failed to implement the 2016 agreement with sufficient determination.

The president who promised total peace has been overtaken by another cycle of Colombia’s endless war. To the old specter of political assassinations once thought to be overcome have been added a string of attacks and bombings. Last week, the vehicle of Senator Alexander López, a Petro and Cepeda ally, was shot at while he was returning from a campaign event in Cali to Popayán, the capital of Cauca, in what the president described as an attempted kidnapping by one of the multiple dissident groups. In mid-May, two campaign activists for De la Espriella were killed in the Meta department. In April, a dissident attack using a cylinder bomb on the Pan-American Highway left at least 19 civilians dead in Cauca, where Indigenous Senator Aida Quilcué — who was briefly kidnapped in February and later became Cepeda’s running mate — had previously been abducted. Cali, the country’s third-largest city, has been the target of several waves of attacks by dissidents led by Iván Mordisco, considered public enemy number one.

Cepeda, the Historic Pact candidate, does not rule out launching new peace talks — an idea widely resisted given the wear of the total peace strategy — and pledges full implementation of the 2016 agreement, arguing that security cannot be reduced solely to state coercion and therefore requires a strengthened preventive approach that tackles the lack of opportunities in peripheral regions. The far-right candidate, De la Espriella, calls for a hard line, strengthening the security forces and toughening the penal system; Valencia adds a call for greater institutional strength. “The narrative on the right is that the only option is to increase military force, but today the Public Forces are already operating with all their capabilities, at all times, and you cannot increase it further,” warns Dickinson of the International Crisis Group. “What can be done is to focus it more strategically.”

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News