Connect with us

%

Some Beaches Now Restrict Sunscreens

Published

on

some-beaches-now-restrict-sunscreens

Some tourist beaches are starting to restrict certain sunscreens over environmental concerns Credit : M-Production, Shutterstock

Packing sunscreen for a beach holiday feels automatic for most travellers. But in some of the world’s most popular coastal destinations, certain sunscreens are now being restricted because of concerns over damage to marine life. That means a product many people use every summer could become a problem depending on where they travel.

The changes are already happening in several tourist hotspots, particularly in places known for coral reefs and protected coastal areas. While nobody is being told to stop protecting their skin, authorities are starting to draw a line around which products are considered acceptable.

Why some sunscreens are causing concern

The issue is linked to chemicals found in many traditional sunscreens.

Ingredients such as oxybenzone, octinoxate and some parabens are commonly used in products designed to protect the skin from UV rays. Scientists and environmental groups have raised concerns for years about the effect these substances may have once they enter the sea.

When thousands of swimmers use sunscreen in the same area, traces of those chemicals wash into the water. In sensitive marine environments, especially around coral reefs, researchers say that can contribute to coral bleaching and damage fragile ecosystems.

That concern has pushed several destinations to act.

The idea is not to ban sun protection itself. The aim is to reduce the use of products considered more harmful to marine environments while encouraging alternatives seen as less damaging.

The beach destinations already changing the rules

Some of the best known holiday destinations have already introduced restrictions. Places in the Caribbean, parts of Mexico, Costa Rica and Hawaii have all adopted rules limiting certain sunscreens. In most cases, the focus is on protecting coral reefs and coastal ecosystems that attract large numbers of tourists every year.

Palau was one of the first countries to move in this direction when it introduced restrictions on reef damaging sunscreens in 2020. Since then, other tourist destinations have followed with their own versions of the rules.

The exact regulations vary from place to place. Some destinations ban specific ingredients. Others encourage visitors to switch to mineral based products instead.

For tourists, that means the same bottle of sunscreen that is perfectly acceptable at one beach may not be welcomed at another.

What travellers are being encouraged to use instead

As restrictions spread, reef friendly sunscreens are becoming easier to find.

These products usually rely on mineral ingredients such as zinc oxide or titanium dioxide rather than the chemical filters that have raised environmental concerns. They are often marketed as reef safe and are increasingly recommended in protected coastal areas.

Hotels, beach shops and pharmacies in affected destinations have also started adapting to the change, with more shelves dedicated to alternative products.

At the same time, another trend has started attracting attention online. Oral sun protection supplements are being promoted as an alternative way to protect the skin.

These products are often made using plant extracts such as Polypodium leucotomos and are marketed as helping reduce the effects of UV exposure.

Dermatologists, however, continue to warn that these supplements are not a replacement for sunscreen. They may offer additional support, but they do not provide complete protection against sunburn or long term sun damage.

That means travellers still need proper topical protection when spending time in the sun.

Why this matters more this summer

The timing is not accidental. As temperatures rise and beach tourism returns to peak season levels, destinations are once again facing huge numbers of visitors. Coastal authorities are under pressure to balance tourism with environmental protection, especially in areas where ecosystems are already vulnerable.

For many travellers, sunscreen restrictions may still sound surprising. After all, sunscreen has long been promoted as essential for preventing skin damage and reducing cancer risk.

That is why most destinations introducing restrictions are careful about how they communicate the rules. The message is not to stop using protection, but to choose products that are considered less harmful to the environment.

It also reflects a wider shift happening across tourism. More destinations are introducing rules linked to sustainability, from limits on cruise ships to tourist taxes and environmental protections.

Beach products are now part of that conversation too.

What tourists should do before travelling

For anyone planning a beach holiday this year, the safest option is to check local guidance before travelling.

Some destinations clearly list which ingredients are restricted and which types of sunscreen are recommended. Buying a suitable product before arriving can avoid confusion once you are there. Travellers should also remember that sun exposure remains a serious health issue, particularly during summer heatwaves.

The goal is not to avoid sunscreen, but to use products that protect both the skin and the environment where possible.

For many tourists, it will probably be the first time they think about what is actually inside the sunscreen they use. But with more destinations introducing restrictions, it is unlikely to be the last.

%

Government In Spain Classifies Immigration Regularisation Documents Under Secrecy Law

Published

on

government-in-spain-classifies-immigration-regularisation-documents-under-secrecy-law

The classification was approved during a meeting of the Council of Ministers Photo credit: Pool Moncloa/Fernando Calvo

The government of Spain has approved the classification of certain reports and administrative documents relating to immigration policy under official secrecy provisions, restricting public access to parts of the material used in decision-making on regularisation processes. The measure was adopted by the Council of Ministers and applies to specific internal documentation connected to immigration management.

It does not apply to all information on immigration policy, but to selected reports and records considered sensitive under existing legal categories. The classification uses two levels defined in Spanish law: “secreto” and “reservado”, which determine the degree of restriction applied to government-held information.

Legal framework governing classified information

The decision is based on the Ley de Secretos Oficiales, which allows the government to classify information when disclosure is considered capable of affecting state interests. The law establishes the categories of “secret” and “restricted”, which limit access to documents for defined periods.

Under this framework, classification can be applied to administrative reports, security-related material and other government documents where disclosure is deemed inappropriate under legal criteria. The system is not specific to immigration policy and has been used across different areas of government administration.

The law also sets out procedures for classification and declassification, although critics have previously argued that it provides limited oversight mechanisms compared with modern transparency standards in other European countries.

Scope of the classified material

The documents affected include internal reports and assessments used in the administration of immigration policy, including processes linked to regularisation of undocumented migrants.

Regularisation procedures in Spain involve administrative decisions that determine eligibility for residence status under specific legal conditions. These processes are supported by internal evaluations and technical reports produced by government departments.

The classification applies to selected material within this administrative framework. Publicly available legislation, policy announcements and general procedural rules remain accessible.

Government procedure and approval

The classification was approved during a meeting of the Council of Ministers, which is responsible for authorising the designation of official secrecy status on government documents.

Once approved, classified material is subject to access restrictions, meaning it cannot be disclosed without authorisation under the terms of the relevant law. The duration of classification depends on the category assigned and the legal criteria applied at the time of designation.

No timeline has been provided for declassification of the documents involved in this case.

Context of immigration policy administration

Immigration policy in Spain is managed through a combination of national legislation and administrative procedures overseen by government departments. Regularisation processes are used in certain circumstances to grant legal status to individuals who meet defined requirements.

These processes are supported by internal assessments, statistical data and policy evaluations used by government bodies in decision-making. The classification affects access to some of this supporting material rather than the legal framework itself.

Spain has previously carried out regularisation programmes under different administrations, each involving administrative review of eligibility criteria and documentation requirements.

Transparency and access considerations

The use of secrecy classifications has periodically been a subject of debate in Spain, particularly in relation to access to public information. The current legal framework predates the modern Spanish constitution and has been the subject of calls for reform from various institutions and civil society groups.

Supporters of reform argue that updated legislation would provide clearer rules on access to government documents and improve transparency. The existing system remains in force and continues to regulate the handling of classified material.

The government has not indicated that the classification decision represents a change in overall immigration policy, focusing instead on the handling of specific internal documents.

Implications for public access to information

As a result of the classification, access to the affected reports is restricted to authorised government personnel. External disclosure is not permitted under the terms of the law unless the documents are declassified through formal procedures.

The decision applies only to the specified material and does not alter existing immigration laws or public-facing policy information. Administrative processes relating to immigration continue to operate under established legal frameworks.

Further details on the scope of the classification or the specific documents involved have not been made public beyond the formal decision of the Council of Ministers.

Continue Reading

%

Mission Impossible With Koen Darras

Published

on

mission-impossible-with-koen-darras

Koen Darras & Lio at Marbella Beach. Credit: Nicole King

I recently met a young man called Koen Darras, a self-proclaimed “Adventurer, Keynote Speaker and Content Creator”. He is the first person in history to climb the ten highest mountains of South America and Africa in succession and conquer the iconic peaks Mont Blanc, Matterhorn, and Eiger in just nine days.

From summiting Denali in Alaska to traversing entire continents, Koen is an undeniable risk-taker and he likes to film it all. He hopes that by pushing his own limits and sharing these expeditions as a full cinematic experience, he may inspire others to step out of their comfort zones too.

Once of his next objectives is to be the world’s first person to cross the Atlantic by kitesurf, some 5,000 kms and 60 days at sea. He plans to start out from the Canary Islands, travel via Cape Verde and then head towards the Caribbean. Although Koen will surf alone he will be accompanied by a sailing boat all the way and a very dedicated team.

In order to prepare for this 2027 mission Koen had been training in the Canary Islands and took the time to come to Marbella on his way back to Belgium to share his passion for this very ambitious adventure.

Koen was accompanied by his 10 year old daughter Lio, who kindly helped me with some recording for the TV interview that I with her dad. From just the brief encounter it was easy to see that she, like her father, embraces the belief that limits are only invitations.

What a great team they make and what an inspirational encounter all round.

Continue Reading

%

34,000 Speeding Fines On Spanish Roads In One Week.

Published

on

34,000-speeding-fines-on-spanish-roads-in-one-week.

More speed cameras and more fines than ever before. Credit: DGT

Between April 13 and 19, officers from the Guardia Civil Traffic Group set up a grand total of 3,537 control points across Spain. They checked speeds of a massive 1,256,540 vehicles during this period. The figure shows an increase of more than 235,000 checks, even bigger than the previous summer operation. It just goes to show that the traffic authorities (DGT) are cracking down harder than ever on speed.

Speeding incidents contributed to 22 per cent of fatal crashes in 2024, making it one of the leading causes of all road deaths. The authorities are now responding each year with ever more targeted enforcement and additional cameras on Spanish roads.

Motorways see majority of penalties

To give an idea of the issue, both DGT and Guardia Civil officers recorded over 78,000 drivers breaking speed limits, representing 6.2 per cent of all vehicles monitored. Motorways and dual carriageways accounted for 53.5 per cent of these penalties, with 41,772 fines dished out there. This area shows a 10 per cent rise versus conventional roads, where officers issued 34,215 fines.

Fifteen drivers faced court proceedings for exceeding limits by more than 80 km/h. Such extreme cases have doubled over the past two years.

Lawmakers consider new 190 km/h offence threshold

Interior Ministry officials are now supporting changes to make rules more effective at stopping dangerous behaviour. A proposal before Congress is hoping to automatically classify driving at 190 km/h on motorways as a criminal offence with potential jail time. The idea is to deter reckless actions that put lives at risk on high-speed routes where many violations occur.

New support line helps accident survivors

At the close of the enforcement week, traffic chiefs introduced a dedicated helpline for people affected by road crashes. The 018 number now delivers free assistance to survivors and their families dealing with physical injuries, emotional trauma, and practical difficulties after incidents.

The service is available in English on request, is not meant for emergencies (continue to use 112 for that), is a free-of-charge call, and is available from 8am to 9pm daily. There is also a WhatsApp version on +34 645 713 823, and even an email service (also possible in English) via victimastrafico@dgt.es.

Trained psychologists, social workers, and legal experts will be staffing the service to help anyone who has been affected by a road accident in Spain. They guide users through administrative processes, provide emotional counselling, and monitor serious cases over extended periods. This resource addresses growing demand from individuals coping with long-term consequences of collisions on Spanish roads.

Change in speeding culture in Spain

Speed enforcement is really starting to take off in Spain as a form of changing a decades-long culture of pushing the accelerator down too far. With more vehicles checked and stricter rules under discussion, drivers can expect ever increasing pressure to respect limits, especially on high-capacity routes.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News