The Cuban government on Wednesday released Jonathan David Muir Burgos, a 16-year-old being held at the high-security Canaleta prison in Ciego de Ávila, who was the youngest political prisoner of the Castro regime. Human rights organizations have confirmed Muir Burgos’s release. The teen was detained after the March 13 protests in Morón; authorities charged him with “sabotage,” and he spent more than three months behind bars.

“It is extremely worrying that the state uses criminal procedures to deprive minors of their liberty and send them to closed penitentiary centers,” says Laritza Diversent, a prominent human rights lawyer and activist exiled in the United States.

Muir Burgos’s case starkly exposes one of the most alarming realities of contemporary Cuba: the systematic criminalization of minors who take part in social protests. Detained after joining the March demonstrations in Morón — sparked by crippling blackouts and widespread food shortages — Muir has become a symbol of a generation trapped in the island’s worst economic crisis in three decades. Diversent, the founder of Cubalex, an organization that monitors human rights on the island, says the group had identified four minors who were imprisoned for taking part in the Morón protest, including Muir Burgos.

The release of Muir Burgos has been received with deep caution by human rights organizations. Diversent warns from exile that this step does not represent the end of the Cuban regime’s repressive policy against citizen demonstrations, but rather a recurring tactic of political survival and controlled prisoner releases.

For Diversent, the main concern is the vulnerability of minors amid the current cycle of social unrest. “It is important, especially in the context of protests over the deterioration of the country’s conditions, to note that minors are often the ones taking on the role of demonstrating and that the state responds without regard for the legal and social characteristics of these youths,” the lawyer explains.

Muir Burgos’s detention was not an isolated incident, but part of a punitive pattern that took shape following the historic protests of July 11, 2021 (known as 11J). Since then, the government of Miguel Díaz-Canel has used the judicial system to quell social unrest through harsh, exemplary sentences, even targeting adolescents who, under the Cuban Penal Code revised in 2022, are held criminally responsible from the age of 16. Organizations such as the Cuban Observatory for Human Rights (OCDH) and Justicia 11J report that hundreds of minors have undergone pretrial proceedings or have been sentenced to detention, in violation of international conventions on the protection of children’s rights.

Diversent insists that Muir Burgos’s release from the Canaleta detention center should not be interpreted as an act of justice or a definitive relief. In fact, she prefers the technical term “release from custody” rather than “freedom,” since the minor remains under the state’s punitive control.

“They have not held a trial yet, but they may have replaced pretrial detention with bail or a formal obligation on record, which means the minor will continue to be monitored by police authorities in his community. This is sometimes even more counterproductive, because it involves constant summonses and threats,” Diversent states, warning of the psychological, potentially irreversible harm and the social stigma that such harassment generates in an adolescent.

The case also takes on a highly sensitive diplomatic dimension due to the timing. The teenager’s detention occurred amid discreet but complex bilateral negotiations between Havana and Washington, in which the U.S. administration maintains as a non-negotiable demand the release of the 1,000-plus political prisoners on the island. The Trump administration has also intensified sanctions and economic pressure on the regime in an effort to force a change of course in the Cuban government.

Diversent directly links releases from custody to internal pressure on the island and the regime’s need to send diplomatic signals to Washington at a moment of peak tension. “All the releases we’ve seen — in 2025, 2026 — have been under pressure,” she insists.

She adds that the government is facing a severe prison overcrowding crisis and is using detainees as bargaining chips. “Releases have always taken place under pressure, and what the government has tried to do is use them as a bargaining tool, which is what we may be seeing here. These releases are meant to tell the U.S. government: ‘Look, we are changing our position.’ Because having minors in prison already looks quite bad,” she explains.

The lawyer recalls that the island’s judicial system lacks independence and follows political directives to hand down harsh sentences aimed at social control: “Charging people with sabotage for protesting against government symbols is incorrect; it is not a crime of sabotage but rather a politically motivated act framed as a threat to state security. This is becoming a pattern for the state,” she explains.

Cubalex’s main concern, therefore, remains unchanged. While Jonathan David Muir Burgos leaves his cell under restrictions, the “revolving door” mechanism, Diversent says, ensures that the flow of detainees in Cuba continues unabated.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition