It was supposed to be a straightforward break-in, but two alleged burglars in Spain appear to have taken an unusual approach to avoiding detection.

The pair were caught hiding behind the bar of a hospitality business in Campo de Criptana, in Ciudad Real province, after allegedly breaking into the premises during the night.

And when Guardia Civil officers arrived, they discovered one of the suspects had apparently come prepared for fingerprints, covering his hands with socks.

Hiding behind the bar

Police were alerted after reports that two people had entered the establishment. When officers arrived, they found that the glass in the entrance door had been smashed.

Inside, the two suspects were allegedly crouched behind the bar, where they were found with bags containing products from the premises.

Officers also discovered several mobile phones, cash and a large screwdriver.

The bizarre detail quickly stood out: one of the suspects had pulled socks over his hands in an apparent attempt to prevent leaving fingerprints at the scene.

The plan falls apart

Despite the apparent attempt to conceal fingerprints, the pair were caught inside the premises before they could make their escape.

The Guardia Civil said the arrests were connected to two separate offences involving forced entry in Campo de Criptana.

Both suspects were subsequently handed over to the court in Alcázar de San Juan. The court ordered that both be remanded in custody.

A very unusual crime scene

Using clothing to try to avoid leaving fingerprints is hardly a foolproof plan, particularly when suspects are discovered hiding inside the premises they are accused of breaking into.

In this case, officers appear to have arrived while the alleged burglars were still inside, finding them behind the bar alongside items believed to have been taken from the business.

For the two alleged burglars, the attempt to keep their fingerprints off the scene ended with both being arrested and sent to prison pending the next stage of the legal proceedings.

There is something extremely comforting about grabbing a cold coffee to go from the supermarket fridge. Coffee, milk, perhaps a little sugar and creme, a quick caffeine hit on the way to work, the beach or wherever the day takes you. Except many of those bottles and cartons are not quite as simple as they look.

Spain’s consumer organisation OCU has examined 91 ready-to-drink coffees sold in supermarkets, and found that just six qualified as a good choice on its Healthy Scale. Another 49 were rated acceptable, while 36 were classed as a poor choice. Not one achieved the organisation’s highest rating.The biggest problems were sugar, additives and increasingly complicated ingredient lists hiding behind labels that can make a chilled coffee look like little more than a convenient café con leche.

The sugar hiding in your cold coffee

The average sugar content across the products examined was 7.6g per 100ml, but some drinks contained considerably more. A typical 230ml or 250ml bottle can therefore contain far more sugar than the number on the front of the label might initially suggest. Cappuccino-style products were among the biggest offenders, averaging around 9% sugar, while flavoured coffees were also among the least healthy options. Caramel, vanilla and other sweet flavours often come with extra ingredients designed to counter the bitterness of coffee and create a creamier taste.

OCU advises shoppers to avoid ready-to-drink coffees containing more than 8g of sugar per 100ml. That means the difference between two apparently similar bottles on the same supermarket shelf can be substantial, particularly when the entire container is usually consumed in one go rather than being treated as several servings.

The coffees OCU rated worst

Of the 91 coffees examined, 36 were classified as a poor choice, with macchiato and cappuccino varieties performing particularly badly. Macchiato coffees dominated the bottom of the rankings, accounting for six of the 11 lowest scores in the entire study. These products generally combined more sugar and calories with longer, more heavily processed ingredient lists.

Cappuccino was the category with the highest average sugar content, while flavoured coffees containing caramel, vanilla or hazelnut also tended to perform poorly. OCU found that these sweeter options often contained more sugar, flavourings and additives than simpler coffee-based drinks.

Shoppers looking for a quick way to identify the less healthy options should pay particular attention to the label. OCU advises avoiding drinks with more than 8g of sugar per 100ml and those containing two or more additives, specifically highlighting E-339, E-340, E-950 and E-955 among the ingredients it does not recommend.

Some contain up to five additives

Sugar was not the only issue, only around one in five of the coffees examined were free from additives. The rest frequently contained ingredients including stabilisers, thickeners, flavourings and acidity regulators, with some products containing as many as five different additives.

The study found that certain types of coffee were consistently more heavily processed than others. Protein and lactose-free coffees often contained three or more additives, while vegan versions also relied on gums and hydrocolloids to recreate the texture normally provided by milk.

Cappuccino, macchiato and flavoured varieties generally performed less well because their recipes tended to be more complicated, combining sugar, creaminess-enhancing ingredients and flavourings. By contrast, espresso-style products usually had simpler compositions and fewer additives.

The four coffees singled out for their composition

Four products were specifically highlighted for having the best compositions in the study:

• Kaiku Caffè Solo Largo Sin Azúcar — 77 points 
• Kaiku Caffè Latte Sin Azúcares Añadidos — 77 points 
• Kaiku Caffè Latte Descafeinado — 76 points 
• Kaiku Caffè Latte Protein Coffee Doble Cero — 73 points 

The highest-scoring product, Kaiku Caffè Solo Largo Sin Azúcar, contains just water and Arabica coffee and has no added sugar or additives. The wider study also found that Kaiku and Nescafé products generally used fewer additives than many competitors, although the exact nutritional profile still varies from product to product.

Espresso can pack a serious caffeine hit

There was another surprise in the results: the amount of caffeine varied dramatically. Only 44 of the 91 products actually stated their caffeine content on the label. Among those that did, the average was 35mg per 100ml, ranging from 20mg to 80mg. Espresso-style drinks contained the highest amounts. A standard 250ml container provided around 130mg of caffeine on average, while one product reached 200mg per container, shockingly this is more than some energy drinks!

So the next time you reach into the supermarket fridge for what looks like a quick take away cold coffee, the label may be worth a second look. The simplest option may not have the flashiest packaging or the most tempting flavour, but according to the latest analysis, it is far more likely to actually resemble a coffee rather than a sugary, heavily processed drink with caffeine added.

Long-time Costa del Sol expat Steve has a simple challenge for readers now summer is winding down. We spent weeks looking after visiting family and friends. Why, he asks, is it so much harder to show that same care to older people living here all year?

Most of us would say we are caring people. Pressed on how we actually show it, many of us hesitate. Holidays proved the skills are already there: patience, kindness, genuine interest and a bit of respect. Caring is not only practical help. It is noticing someone and treating them as if they still matter.

Summer proved we already know how to care

Steve’s point is blunt. Reluctance, not ability, is what holds people back. A chat on the street, a regular visit or a quick “how are you today?” can change an older neighbour’s week. Listening to the answer is the part that counts. You see the difference when the interest is real.

Older residents carry decades of experience, knowledge and stories. Take time to hear them and both sides come away better off. They are usually delighted to share that wisdom if someone bothers to ask.

Small acts that actually land

Tiny gestures often do more than grand plans. A short phone call or a few minutes of company will do more good than most people expect. NHS advice on loneliness in older people makes the same case: a friendly conversation or a regular call can be enough.

Isolation among British retirees on this coast is already well documented by Euro Weekly News. Groups such as Age Concern Fuengirola, Mijas and Benalmadena and the Soledad 0, Vida 10 volunteer work exist for a reason. Coach trips and coffee mornings help, as Age Concern’s Estepona outings have shown. None of that replaces a neighbour who knocks.

Steve has written before about retirement and purpose and staying safe on local roads. His latest message is quieter. Use the same caring we showed visitors, here on the Costa del Sol, so older people feel heard, valued, respected and not forgotten.