Cleaners, carers and seasonal workers across Spain are in line for a bigger pay packet from January, with the proposed minimum for hourly home help rising by 51 cents to €10.06. It’s part of a wider minimum wage rise the government wants signed off before voters go to the polls on Sunday November 29.

Hourly home help would rise to €10.06

Cleaners, carers and nannies paid by the hour would be entitled to at least €10.06 for every hour worked from January 1, up from €9.55, under a draft government order published this week.

That’s a rise of 51 cents, or roughly €80 over a year for someone who cleans for three hours every week and around €530 for a carer who works 20 hours a week. The rate applies to domestic workers who are paid by the hour and don’t live in the household, and the draft says the €10.06 has to cover every part of their pay for the hours actually worked.

The draft also says only cash counts towards the minimum, so payment in kind, such as food or accommodation, can’t be used to make up the difference. 

Short-term staff would get at least €60.88 a day

Workers on short contracts would see a bump too. Anyone hired for up to 120 days by the same company would be entitled to at least €60.88 for each legal working day, up from €57.82 this year.

That daily rate is meant to cover the worker’s share of Sundays, public holidays and the two extra annual payments (pagas extra, normally paid in summer and at Christmas), which is why it’s higher than the plain daily rate of €42.87 that applies to the standard minimum wage. Holiday pay for these workers is regulated separately.

The main minimum wage would climb €65 a month

For everyone else on the minimum, the draft sets €1,286 gross a month over 14 payments, or €18,004 a year for a full-time job. That’s a rise of 5.3 per cent, or €65 more a month than now and €910 across the year.

A group of experts advising the Labour Ministry had recommended 4.9 per cent, which would have meant €1,281 a month, so the government’s figure is slightly higher, only by about €5 a month. The unions CCOO and UGT had asked for at least 7 per cent, which would have meant around €1,306. They’ve made their backing conditional on the decree stopping employers from absorbing existing pay supplements into the new minimum, and hadn’t yet commented on the figure.

Anyone already earning more than €18,004 a year for full-time work isn’t affected, and the minimum will have risen by almost 75 per cent since 2018, when it was €736 a month. We compared the current €17,094 a year with UK minimum pay last month, in case you missed it.

Tax is still withheld, then claimed back

Elma Saiz, Spain’s Social Security minister and government spokesperson, said the Spanish tax agency would again approve a deduction so that minimum wage earners pay no income tax (IRPF).

This year, though, employers would still withhold tax from monthly pay, and the money could only be recovered by filing the annual tax return the following year. The draft also says regional or local rules, and private contracts that use the minimum wage as a reference, will stay on this year’s figure unless the parties agree otherwise.

Approval could land in the middle of the election campaign

The draft is open to comments until Monday November 16. The Council of Ministers could then approve it on Tuesday November 17 or Tuesday November 24, with the campaign officially starting on Friday November 13 and the general election on Sunday November 29.

Last year’s rise wasn’t signed off until Wednesday February 18, and it was backdated to January 1. The new draft is written to apply from January 1. Until the decree is approved and published in the BOE (Spain’s official state gazette), the €1,286 and the new hourly and daily rates remain proposals, so the final figures are worth checking once they appear there.

Repeated breakdowns raise questions over investment (or a lack of), reliability and whether a change of government could make a difference. Costa del Sol citizens are at the end of their tether.

Passengers travelling between Malaga and Fuengirola faced another day of disruption and waiting on Thursday, November 5, after a technical fault on a Cercanías (commuter) train caused widespread delays, cancellations and overcrowding.

The latest problems affected the C1 line, with passengers reporting waits of up to an hour at Plaza Mayor. Some trains were running late, while passengers reported smoke and an unusual smell around the wheels of a train at La Colina in Torremolinos. Some services were cancelled and others required passengers to change trains.

According to Málaga Hoy’s report on the latest Cercanías disruption, the problems also affected the C2 service between Malaga and Alora.

A difficult week for Malaga commuters

Thursday’s disruption followed three consecutive days of problems reported across the network, with delays, cancelled services and compulsory changes of train.

On Sunday, November 1, around 20 passengers were left stranded after a technical failure stopped the last train travelling towards Fuengirola. Renfe eventually arranged taxis to take them home. EWN previously reported the late-night breakdown which left Malaga passengers stranded.

The following night, a man died after being struck by a train near Torreblanca, forcing the suspension of services between Benalmadena and Fuengirola. This was a separate and tragic incident, rather than a mechanical failure. Even more operational problems followed on Tuesday and Wednesday, before Thursday’s technical fault brought another round of passenger complaints.

Spanish newspaper El Español counted 37 service disruption notices on Thursday alone, covering delays, cancellations, partial interruptions and a compulsory passenger transfer. Renfe attributed the latest C1 problems to a technical fault affecting one train, while the C2 experienced separate difficulties.

Why the Fuengirola railway is significant

The 32-kilometre C1 connects Malaga city with the airport, Torremolinos, Benalmadena and Fuengirola. It is an essential transport link for residents commuting to work, tourists travelling between resorts and airport passengers avoiding increasingly congested roads.

Renfe’s 2025 passenger figures show that Malaga’s two Cercanías lines carried 15.54 million passengers last year, with the bulk of demand concentrated on the C1. At some points, passenger numbers reach 150 per cent of available seating capacity.

Renfe plans to invest €66.7 million in seven new high-capacity trains for the Fuengirola route, expected to enter service from 2028. A further €40 million is earmarked for a new maintenance workshop.

Meanwhile, Adif has been working on a project to add 2.8 kilometres of double track between Malaga Airport and Campamento Benitez, helping to address infrastructure limitations that restrict how frequently trains can run.

Could we do with a change?

Responsibility for Spain’s state railway network ultimately falls on the national government through the Transport Ministry, Adif and Renfe. A change of administration in Madrid could therefore bring different investment priorities, management decisions and expectations for service improvements.

However, replacing the government would not automatically solve the railway’s problems. The infrastructure limitations, maintenance requirements and growing passenger numbers would still need to be addressed. For thousands of people who depend on the C1 every day, the promised new trains and infrastructure improvements offer some hope, but they will not arrive overnight.

Whether under the present administration or a future government, the question remains the same: how can a railway serving one of Spain’s busiest coastal areas provide a service passengers can actually rely on?

There are some things Italians take very seriously: their coffee, their pasta, their nonna, their olive oil and, apparently, the right of a pizza to remain pineapple-free. One Italian chef was so opposed to the tropical topping that he refused to make it for customers, even after his boss asked him repeatedly.

Davide Tamburella, who worked at La Costa Restaurant and Bar in Brisbane, Australia, considered putting pineapple on pizza an insult to his Italian culture. His refusal to prepare ham and pineapple pizzas for a private function became one of several issues raised by management before he was dismissed in May. The dispute has since reached Australia’s Fair Work Commission, turning one of the world’s most divisive pizza toppings into an employment case. 

A pizza topping that crossed a line

This was not Tamburella’s first disagreement with his employer over pineapple. According to the commission’s findings, it was the third time in four years that he had refused to put the fruit on pizzas. On an earlier occasion, he had reportedly asked his boss to look into how important it was to Italians not to put pineapple on pizza. When the request came up again, he maintained that instructions from management did not have to be followed if they offended his culture.

His employer, Elliot Ingram, had a rather different concern: customers had ordered the pizzas, and the restaurant was expected to serve them. The function was reportedly worth more than AU$15,000, making the disagreement considerably more expensive than a heated debate over dinner. La Costa was in Queensland, Australia’s pineapple-growing heartland, where the fruit is big business. The state produces Australia’s commercially grown pineapples, so the chef had found himself defending Italian culinary tradition in the middle of pineapple country. 

The dispute was about more than pizza

Management said the topping was not the only problem. The complaints raised before Tamburella’s dismissal also included his use of inappropriate language, his communication style and what was described as growing frustration in the workplace. He had also injured his right hand after striking a metal handrail at work in April, fracturing bones in two places. Tamburella argued that the injury had played a part in his dismissal, alongside the dispute over the pizzas.

He was dismissed on May 20, around a fortnight after a meeting with management. The restaurant’s managing director later said there was more to the dispute than pineapple on pizza. That is worth remembering before imagining an entire restaurant throwing its hands up because one chef refused to reach for a tin of pineapple. 

Chef loses challenge over dismissal

Tamburella took his case to Australia’s Fair Work Commission, arguing that his dismissal was unfair. The commission rejected his application in a decision released on November 3. However, it did not rule that the restaurant was right to dismiss him over the pineapple dispute. His application had been lodged outside the legal time limit, and Commissioner Jennifer Hunt found there were no exceptional circumstances to justify accepting it late. The commission therefore did not determine the substantive fairness of the dismissal. 

The consequences extended beyond the kitchen. Tamburella had been pursuing an employer-sponsored permanent residency visa, a process he had reportedly spent more than three years working towards. After his dismissal, the restaurant ended its sponsorship, leaving him needing to find another employer if he wanted to pursue that route.

La Costa itself closed in July after its lease expired, with the owner citing high operating costs. Tamburella has since found work as head chef at another Brisbane Italian restaurant. In a final twist, pineapple is not on that restaurant’s menu. The chef may have lost his job and his first legal challenge, but at least his new kitchen appears to share his position on the great pineapple debate. Whether that is culinary principle or simply a very specific recruitment requirement is another question