Connect with us

%

Renters In Spain Face New Threat From ‘desokupa’ Tactics

Published

on

renters-in-spain-face-new-threat-from-‘desokupa’-tactics

Are renters safe from evictions outside the law? Credit: Eduardo Bena – Shutterstock

Spain’s controversial private ‘desokupa’ companies have become a familiar name in the country’s long-running battle over illegal property occupation. Euro Weekly News has previously reported on the use of these companies to help property owners recover homes occupied without permission, including a case in Malaga province involving a company hired to remove occupants from a property in Mijas.

But there is another side to the growing use of private eviction specialists that renters in Spain need to know about. What happens when the people being targeted are not squatters at all, but legal tenants?

Some cases have involved families with children, elderly people and workers who legally rented a property at an agreed price, only to find themselves under pressure to leave while other advertised rents in their area have risen sharply. For those who are fully up to date with their rent and have a legal right to remain in their homes, the arrival of a private ‘desokupa’ team can create a very different situation.

These tenants are not people who have broken into an empty property. They are not simply refusing to leave after the landlord has had a change of mind and new ideas for the property. They may have a valid rental contract, be paying their rent and be legally entitled to continue living there.

Rising rents create a powerful financial incentive

There is also a financial factor that tenants cannot ignore. Average advertised rents in Malaga province, for example, have reached €18.70 per square metre in August 2026, according to Idealista, making Malaga the third most expensive province in Spain behind Madrid and the Balearic Islands. Rents in the province were 4.5 per cent higher than a year earlier. That difference can be particularly important for a property with a long-standing tenant whose rent is below today’s market rate.

For a landlord, replacing an existing tenancy with a new one could potentially mean a considerably higher monthly income. That creates a financial incentive to regain possession of a property, even though it does not give an owner the right to intimidate or forcibly remove a tenant who is legally entitled to remain.

Rising rents do not mean landlords are routinely using private eviction companies to remove paying tenants. But they do provide an important backdrop to a growing question: what happens when the financial value of a property has risen sharply, but the person living there has a legal right to stay? That is where the distinction between legitimate property recovery and intimidation becomes crucial.

A landlord who wants to recover a property cannot simply replace the legal eviction process with pressure from a private company. A tenant’s legal right to occupy a home does not disappear because the property could command a higher rent on today’s market.

And, very importantly, a private ‘desokupa’ company does not have the right to break down the door of an occupied home or enter it without the resident’s consent simply because a landlord wants the property back. Spain’s Constitution protects the inviolability of the home, while Article 202 of the Penal Code makes unlawful entry into another person’s home a criminal offence. In practical terms, having been hired by a property owner does not give a private eviction company police powers or the right to force its way inside. Many who feel intimidated by these ‘desokupa’ groups needn’t feel concerned by this. The constitutional protection does have exceptions, including consent, a judicial order and ‘flagrante delicto’ (for example, refusal to pay rent), but that has to be decided by the courts and, if necessary, carried out by the police.

How tenants can be pressured to leave

According to sources EWN is in contact with who are familiar with these cases, pressure on tenants does not always involve an obvious physical assault. Tactics can be designed to make people feel watched, intimidated or simply unable to live peacefully in their own home.

Reported methods can include:

  • Repeated visits to the property, with people waiting outside or repeatedly banging on the door.
  • Threatening or intimidating language, particularly when tenants refuse to leave voluntarily, or fast enough.
  • Persistent verbal abuse or harassment intended to put pressure on occupants.
  • Offers of money to leave, sometimes combined with warnings about what could happen if the tenant refuses.
  • Attempts to control access to the building, making tenants feel that entering or leaving their own home will become difficult.
  • Confrontational behaviour that can provoke a reaction, potentially leaving a frightened or angry tenant facing competing accounts of what happened.
  • Physical intimidation or violence in more serious cases, something that has already featured in reported cases involving private desokupacion companies.

In private conversations with Guardia Civil officers, EWN has learned that officers are aware of the difficulties these cases can present, particularly when alleged aggressors dispute what happened or claim their actions were lawful. Officers may arrive after a confrontation has taken place, leaving them with competing accounts of exactly what happened and limited evidence of what was said or done beforehand.

That makes evidence particularly important. Messages, recordings where legally permitted, photographs, CCTV footage and independent witnesses can all help establish what really happened. None of these tactics gives a private company the right to force a lawful tenant from their home. Spain’s Penal Code specifically covers coercion, while Article 172 provides stronger penalties where coercion is intended to prevent the legitimate enjoyment of a home.

What should tenants do?

For tenants facing this kind of pressure, the safest response is not to get drawn into a physical confrontation. Some sources familiar with these cases also warn that confrontational behaviour can provoke a reaction from tenants, potentially turning a frightening situation into a more complicated police investigation. Keep records of visits and messages, save photographs or video where legally appropriate, note the names of witnesses and preserve any available CCTV evidence. If there is an immediate threat or violence, call 112 and report what has happened to the police or Guardia Civil.

%

Torre Del Mar ONCE Seller Hands Out €1.235 Million In Lottery Prizes

Published

on

torre-del-mar-once-seller-hands-out-e1.235-million-in-lottery-prizes

Juan Carlos Zalazar, regular ONCE ticket seller. Credit: OV FB

Juan Carlos Zalazar sold a lottery ticket that won €1.235 million in local lottery prizes along his usual Torre del Mar route, including one €500,000 jackpot and 21 prizes of €35,000.

Torre del Mar ONCE seller delivers €1.235 million

Zalazar sold 22 winning coupons during his Thursday, September 24 route around Torre del Mar. The winning number was 35972, with series 044 taking the top €500,000 prize.

Zalazar has worked as an ONCE seller since 2022 and does not have a fixed sales point. His winning tickets went to customers he knows from his daily rounds, spreading the money among several familiar faces in the Axarquia town. Born in Bolivia, Zalazar has lived in Spain for 20 years.

Lottery windfall arrives on wedding anniversary

An extra twist came on the same day as Zalazar’s 15th wedding anniversary. His wife is from Torre del Mar, and he joked that the payout had given them a reason to extend their celebrations.

“I’m very happy to have been able to give so much luck to my customers, who are there every day,” he said.

Some winners needed convincing before celebrating. Zalazar said one customer was doubtful because the previous day’s winning number had also ended in two. Friday brought no day off for the lucky seller. He was back on his route as usual.

How much does the ONCE Cupón Diario pay?

The Cupón Diario is drawn from Monday to Thursday. The main prize is €500,000 for matching all five numbers and the series, while 49 coupons matching the five numbers win €35,000.

Thursday’s coupon was dedicated to sport and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, carrying the message ‘Sport for sustainable development’.

The Torre del Mar payout comes less than two weeks after another ONCE windfall in the Axarquia area. On September 13, seller Francisco Lucia sold a Sueldazo in Torrox Costa worth €2,000 a month for ten years, or €240,000 in total.

ONCE uses income from its lottery products to fund programmes and services for people who are blind or have severe visual disabilities. The organisation also provides employment opportunities for thousands of people with disabilities, with its network of more than 21,400 sellers playing a central role in distributing its lottery products across Spain.

Continue Reading

%

Is Your Supermarket Kefir Really Kefir? Spanish Study Raises A Surprising Question

Published

on

is-your-supermarket-kefir-really-kefir?-spanish-study-raises-a-surprising-question

The researchers found considerable differences depending on the type of product. Photo credit:Tetyana_Pidkaluyk / Shutterstock.com

Kefir has gone from something most people had barely heard of to a regular fixture in Spanish supermarket fridges. It is sold as a healthy fermented drink, often bought by people looking for an easy way to add beneficial bacteria and other microorganisms to their diet. But there is a rather awkward problem hiding behind the label.   A study by researchers at Spain’s Universitat Rovira i Virgili has found that you cannot reliably tell from the packaging whether the kefir you are buying contains yeast, one of the microorganisms traditionally found in kefir fermentation.

Researchers examined 170 kefir products sold in Spain and initially found that just 36 mentioned yeast on their labels.  After one manufacturer corrected an apparent labelling error affecting two products, that figure rose to 38. So, in a supermarket aisle packed with bottles proudly calling themselves kefir, the name alone may not tell you very much about what is actually inside.

What makes kefir kefir?

The distinction is important because traditional kefir is rather more complicated than ordinary yoghurt. Kefir is produced through fermentation involving a community of microorganisms. These include lactic-acid bacteria, acetic-acid bacteria and yeasts, which work together during the fermentation process. That mixture is part of what gives traditional kefir its particular characteristics.

The researchers compared Spanish supermarket products with the international Codex Alimentarius definition of kefir, which recognises the combination of bacteria and yeasts involved in its production. The problem is that European food labelling rules do not require manufacturers to list every microorganism present in a fermented product. That leaves shoppers with a surprisingly simple problem: the front of the bottle may say kefir, but the label may not tell them whether yeast is actually part of the fermentation.

Researchers checked 170 supermarket products

The study was carried out in August 2025 and looked at 170 products from 46 brands sold through national and regional supermarket chains covering around 60 per cent of the Spanish market. The researchers recorded information including the type of milk or other base used, whether the kefir was drinkable or spoonable, its price, whether it was organic and what manufacturers said about its microorganisms. Only 36 products, or 21.2 per cent, explicitly mentioned yeast.

The researchers later issued a correction after Danone informed them that two Activia kefir products did contain yeast, despite it not appearing on their packaging because of an error during the production of the labels. That brings the number to 38 products, or 22.35 per cent. The finding does not mean that the other 132 products were fake kefir or contained no yeast. The study was primarily an examination of product information and labelling, rather than a laboratory test proving the microbial composition of every bottle, that distinction is crucial.

Some kefir products were more transparent

The researchers found considerable differences depending on the type of product.Among cow’s milk kefirs, yeast was declared on 29.9 per cent of labels. None of the goat’s milk, sheep’s milk, mixed goat-and-sheep, plant-based or water kefirs in the sample declared yeast. Drinkable products were also more likely to mention it than spoonable kefirs. Yeast appeared on the labels of 35.7 per cent of drinkable products, compared with 13.1 per cent of spoonable versions. There were differences according to where the products were made, too. 

Yeast was declared by 14.7 per cent of nationally produced products, compared with 53.3 per cent of products whose origin was not Spanish. The figures produced another unexpected result when researchers looked at price. Among the cheapest products, 36.8 per cent declared yeast. That fell to 28.1 per cent in the middle price group and just one of the 56 products in the highest-price group. Organic kefir was even more striking. None of the 63 organic products examined declared yeast, compared with 35.5 per cent of conventional products.

What should Spanish shoppers make of it?

The study does not mean people should stop buying kefir, nor does it show that most supermarket kefir is somehow fraudulent. What it does show is that consumers cannot use the label alone to establish the microbial composition of many products sold as kefir. For people buying it specifically because they want traditionally fermented kefir, that lack of information is significant. The researchers argue that clearer labelling would give consumers a better understanding of what they are buying.

They also point to the lack of specific microbiological requirements for kefir under current European rules, compared with the international Codex standard. Kefir may have become a familiar sight in Spanish supermarket fridges, but the research suggests that the name on the bottle does not necessarily give shoppers the full story. And when the whole reason for buying a fermented food is what is happening inside it, that seems like a fairly important detail to leave off the label.

Continue Reading

%

Feijóo Targets Spain’s Rising Prices With 0% Food VAT And Lower Energy Tax

Published

on

feijoo-targets-spain’s-rising-prices-with-0%-food-vat-and-lower-energy-tax

If your weekly supermarket shop seems to be eating an ever-bigger chunk of your pay packet, a proposal from Spain’s opposition could make an immediate difference to what you pay at the till, at least if it becomes law. The PP wants basic food to have zero VAT, energy VAT cut from 21% to 10% and income tax bands adjusted for inflation. 

The party is also proposing bigger tax deductions for families with children. None of these changes has been approved. They are proposals that the PP says it will take to Congress and the Senate for a vote. 

Zero VAT on the supermarket basics

Alberto Núñez Feijóo announced the package on Thursday, September 24, during a visit to a dairy company in Alovera, Guadalajara. Under the proposal, VAT on basic foods would fall from the current 4% rate to 0%. The list includes milk, cheese, oil, eggs, fruit, vegetables, meat, fish and preserves. 

For shoppers, the idea is straightforward: remove the tax from those products and reduce the amount paid at the checkout. Whether the full saving would reach consumers would depend on how businesses pass the tax reduction through to prices, so the proposal should not be read as a guaranteed reduction in every supermarket bill. The PP is presenting the measure as part of a package aimed at easing pressure on household finances as prices continue to rise.

What deflating IRPF actually means

The other proposal that could affect working households is deflating the IRPF, which means adjusting income-tax bands in line with inflation. The issue is that wages can rise simply because prices have gone up. If tax brackets remain unchanged, part of that nominal increase can push someone into a higher tax band even though their purchasing power has not actually improved. The PP wants the income-tax system adjusted to take inflation into account. The party is also proposing to double certain deductions for children, retroactively from August until the end of the year. 

Under its figures, the deduction for a first child would rise from €2,400 to €4,800, while the amount for a second child would increase from €2,700 to €5,400. The proposed figures rise further for third and subsequent children.  For a family with two children, the PP calculates that the measure would mean an additional €400 in savings by the end of the year. It also wants the deduction for a child under three to rise from €2,800 to €5,600.  Those are the PP’s calculations, rather than guaranteed savings.

Energy tax would also be cut

Energy is another major part of the proposal. Feijóo wants VAT on energy reduced from 21% to 10%, covering the cost pressures affecting electricity, gas and fuels.  The proposal comes after the government’s previous tax reductions on fuel and electricity ended on July 1, with those measures replaced by direct discounts on petrol that have since been reduced. 

Energy prices have remained a concern going into the autumn. Recent reporting has also pointed to renewed pressure from higher gas and energy costs, with the government looking at ways to contain the impact on households and businesses. 

Farmers, autónomos and businesses

The PP package is not limited to household taxes. Feijóo is also proposing lower costs for farmers through changes affecting fertiliser and fuel expenses, alongside measures intended to reduce production costs.

The party wants progress on the European measure to remove VAT obligations for autónomos with annual turnover below €85,000 and is calling for fewer bureaucratic requirements for businesses.  The PP says unnecessary administrative procedures add costs which can ultimately feed into prices.

What happens next?

The proposals now face the political process rather than automatically becoming changes to Spanish tax law. The PP says it will take the package to both Congress and the Senate for debate and voting. The Senate has a PP majority, while approval in Congress would depend on the parliamentary numbers there.  For households, that means there is nothing to change on a supermarket bill or tax return just yet.

If the measures eventually pass, however, the potential changes would reach several everyday expenses at once: the food shop, energy bills and income tax, with additional relief proposed for families with children. For anyone already watching every euro at the checkout, that is the part worth keeping an eye on.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News