Bilateral relations between the U.S. and Mexico have entered a new phase — more critical, and with increasingly little room for manoeuvre for Mexico. After the U.S. Department of Justice indicted the governor of Sinaloa and nine other senior officials last week, everything suggests this is only the prelude to a more aggressive U.S. campaign against the links between politics and organised crime.
In recent days, the White House has rolled out new plans, the president and acting attorney general have issued forceful statements, and there have even been moves aimed at tightening the net around Mexico’s diplomatic apparatus north of the border. The pressure is mounting, not only because of the scale of the narcopolitics allegations. In just a few weeks, two key dates for the North American triangle — with Canada included — will begin: the World Cup and, above all, the negotiations to renew the USMCA trade pact, Mexico’s economic lifeline.
Faced with this pressure, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s response has so far been defensive, trying to carve out some space by insisting on Washington’s own obligations: arms trafficking, the drug market, and even the indifference shown toward a handful of extradition requests.
Since this new chapter in the fraught bilateral relationship began, Donald Trump had maintained an unusual silence. On Wednesday, he broke it with his characteristic bluntness: “If they’re [referring to Mexico] not going to do the job, we will.” The threat carries even more weight because it comes paired with the roadmap for his personal war on drugs. Both the Counterterrorism Strategy and the National Drug Strategy, presented this week, are the culmination of the White House’s military intervention campaign in Latin America.
In one of his first acts upon taking office, Trump designated drug cartels as terrorist organizations, a move that goes far beyond mere rhetoric, opening the door to military interventions in third countries. This has already happened in the Caribbean with the U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats. The documents released this week confirm and deepen this interventionist approach: “We will continue our military and law enforcement campaigns against all the cartels and gangs designated as terrorist organizations,” reads the 2026 Counterterrorism Strategy. “We will do so in concert with local governments when they are willing and able to work with us. If they cannot, or will not, we will still take whatever action is necessary to protect our country.”
For Mexico, the legal threat has already materialized with the indictment by a New York court against the governor of Sinalos Rubén Rocha Moya — now on leave — and nine other Sinaloa officials. The Department of Justice has requested their arrest and extradition on charges of working for the Sinaloa Cartel. And all signs suggest they will not be the last. On Wednesday, the acting U.S. attorney general, Todd Blanche, said — without offering details — that more charges are ready against Mexican politicians allegedly linked to drug trafficking. Sheinbaum has again insisted that Washington “send evidence,” while also opening the door to a Mexican judicial investigation into the accused.
The escalation also has a significant prequel. An accident three weeks ago in the mountains of Chihuahua revealed that two CIA agents were conducting joint operations with the state attorney’s office. According to Raúl Benítez Manaut, a researcher at the Center for Research on North America, that controversy was the trigger for everything that has followed.
“The president’s response, wrapped in a very pronounced nationalism, did not sit well with the White House,” notes the academic, who does not believe there will be any developments in the short term: “The extradition treaty with the United States gives Mexico 60 days to proceed with the request. Given the Attorney General’s Office investigation, the accused will almost certainly file for legal protection, which will give them even more time.”
The timeline also coincides with the start of the World Cup, which Mexico and the United States are co-hosting with Canada. According to the academic, the soccer tournament will be “a buffer against tension” — a pause for which preparations are largely complete and that will now take priority.
“The U.S. security apparatus is already here — the FBI, the CIA — overseeing the security protocols. They are concerned, for example, about the Guadalajara venue,” says Manaut.
He predicts that, until after the World Cup, there will be “no movement, no arrests, no destruction of laboratories, for example.” Regarding what might happen afterward, everything will depend on the evolution of the Rocha case in Sinaloa. “If there are no credible advances in the Mexican investigation, a mini-Maduro operation involving a governor from one of the northern states cannot be ruled out,” the expert notes, referring to the U.S. capture of the Venezuelan president from the Presidential Palace in Caracas.
The pressure also has another crucial variable. The Mexican economy is going through a dangerous period of weakness, and, coupled with Trump’s trade war, the USMCA has become more important than ever. “If the U.S. decides to walk away from the negotiating table, Mexico will have no alternative but to make some concessions on security,” Manaut adds. The Mexican government has stepped up its displays of effectiveness in the fight against crime, with a sharp rise in arrests — including the killing of “El Mencho,” the most‑wanted drug lord, in an operation — as well as increased drug seizures and the transfer of nearly 100 jailed cartel bosses across the border.
Acting U.S. Attorney General Blanche alluded to these extraditions during his recent, controversial statements. “One consequence of having a lot of the leaders of some of these cartels brought here over the past year […] is some of them will likely want to cooperate, and that cooperation could lead to additional charges.”
For analyst David Pérez Esperanza, who served on the Executive Secretariat of the National Public Security System during the administration of Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, “The U.S. is making political use of the statements made by these detainees, increasing the pressure and leaving very few alternatives.”
Another twist in the pressure campaign emerged on Thursday. According to CBS, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is considering closing some Mexican consulates, accusing the diplomatic network of trying to influence the November midterm elections, where Trump’s control of Congress is at stake.
Analyst Esparza believes Sheinbaum is up against a dilemma that is increasingly hard to avoid: “Either maintain a defensive nationalist discourse as leader of the Morena party, or act pragmatically against corruption, as she has already done by removing Attorney General Gertz and Adán Augusto López from their posts.” The fight against corruption, the academic concludes, “is the great unfinished business of the Fourth Transformation [the political movement launched by López Obardor], which has so far only been a narrative.”
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
A term abroad is increasingly seen as a compromise between immersion and continuity. Photo credit: Sergey Novikov/Shutterstock
As the academic year draws to a close, many families in Spain are already making plans for the next. Alongside decisions about schools and extracurricular activities, a growing number are considering whether their children should spend part of their education abroad. The idea is not new, but the way it is being approached is changing.
For years, a full academic year in another country was seen as the most effective way to achieve fluency in English. However, this option has not always been practical for every student or family. The financial cost, the disruption to studies and the emotional challenge of a long absence have led many to look for alternatives that offer similar benefits with fewer drawbacks.
A shift towards shorter stays
Recent reporting highlights a clear shift towards shorter programmes, particularly those lasting a single term. According to information published by ASEPROCE, thousands of Spanish students travel abroad each year during their secondary education, with the majority doing so to improve their English.
A term abroad is increasingly seen as a compromise between immersion and continuity. Students are typically enrolled in a local school in an English-speaking country, where they follow classes alongside domestic pupils. This allows them to develop language skills in a structured environment without missing an entire academic year at home.
Countries such as the United States, Ireland, the United Kingdom and Canada remain among the most popular destinations. Their education systems, combined with the widespread use of English in daily life, make them attractive choices for families seeking practical results.
Balancing education and experience
One of the reasons for the rise in term-length programmes is the balance they offer between academic progress and personal experience. A shorter stay reduces the risk of falling behind in the Spanish curriculum, which can be a concern for students preparing for key examinations.
At the same time, the period is long enough to provide meaningful exposure to the language. Living with host families or in supervised accommodation, students are required to communicate in English throughout the day, both inside and outside the classroom. This level of immersion is difficult to replicate through lessons alone.
Parents also tend to view shorter stays as more manageable from a personal perspective. For younger students in particular, a few months abroad can feel less daunting than an entire year away from home.
Cost and accessibility
Financial considerations play a significant role in these decisions. A full academic year abroad can represent a substantial expense, placing it out of reach for many households. In contrast, a single term is generally more affordable, although it still requires a considerable investment.
Programme costs vary depending on destination, school type and accommodation, but a single term abroad typically starts at around €10,000 to €13,000. In many cases, fees can rise to €15,000 or more, particularly for private schools or placements in countries such as the United Kingdom or the United States.
These costs generally include tuition, accommodation, often with a host family, and local support services. However, additional expenses such as flights, insurance and personal spending are usually not included, increasing the overall cost.
By comparison, a full academic year abroad can exceed €25,000 to €35,000, which is one of the reasons shorter stays are becoming more attractive to families seeking a balance between cost and immersion.
Focus on English proficiency
The emphasis on English reflects its continued importance in education and employment. While Spain has made efforts to strengthen language teaching in schools, some families believe that time spent abroad offers a level of fluency that is difficult to achieve in the classroom alone.
Organisations such as ASEPROCE report that the vast majority of students who take part in international programmes do so with the primary aim of improving their English. The experience is also linked to greater confidence in communication, which can be valuable in both academic and professional settings.
A growing but measured trend
Although interest in term-length stays is increasing, it remains a considered decision rather than a widespread expectation. Not all students are suited to studying abroad, and families continue to weigh the advantages against the potential challenges.
Schools in Spain also play a role in guiding these choices, often advising on how time abroad can fit within a student’s overall education. In some cases, agreements between institutions help ensure that coursework completed overseas is recognised on return.
Looking ahead
The rise in shorter study programmes suggests a gradual shift in how families approach language learning. Rather than committing to a full year abroad, many are opting for a more flexible model that allows students to gain international experience without stepping entirely outside the Spanish education system.
As demand continues, providers are likely to expand the range of options available, offering different durations and destinations to suit varying needs. For now, the term abroad has established itself as a practical alternative, reflecting both the importance placed on English and the realities faced by modern families.
A term abroad is increasingly seen as a compromise between immersion and continuity. Photo credit: Sergey Novikov/Shutterstock
As the academic year draws to a close, many families in Spain are already making plans for the next. Alongside decisions about schools and extracurricular activities, a growing number are considering whether their children should spend part of their education abroad. The idea is not new, but the way it is being approached is changing.
For years, a full academic year in another country was seen as the most effective way to achieve fluency in English. However, this option has not always been practical for every student or family. The financial cost, the disruption to studies and the emotional challenge of a long absence have led many to look for alternatives that offer similar benefits with fewer drawbacks.
A shift towards shorter stays
Recent reporting highlights a clear shift towards shorter programmes, particularly those lasting a single term. According to information published by ASEPROCE, thousands of Spanish students travel abroad each year during their secondary education, with the majority doing so to improve their English.
A term abroad is increasingly seen as a compromise between immersion and continuity. Students are typically enrolled in a local school in an English-speaking country, where they follow classes alongside domestic pupils. This allows them to develop language skills in a structured environment without missing an entire academic year at home.
Countries such as the United States, Ireland, the United Kingdom and Canada remain among the most popular destinations. Their education systems, combined with the widespread use of English in daily life, make them attractive choices for families seeking practical results.
Balancing education and experience
One of the reasons for the rise in term-length programmes is the balance they offer between academic progress and personal experience. A shorter stay reduces the risk of falling behind in the Spanish curriculum, which can be a concern for students preparing for key examinations.
At the same time, the period is long enough to provide meaningful exposure to the language. Living with host families or in supervised accommodation, students are required to communicate in English throughout the day, both inside and outside the classroom. This level of immersion is difficult to replicate through lessons alone.
Parents also tend to view shorter stays as more manageable from a personal perspective. For younger students in particular, a few months abroad can feel less daunting than an entire year away from home.
Cost and accessibility
Financial considerations play a significant role in these decisions. A full academic year abroad can represent a substantial expense, placing it out of reach for many households. In contrast, a single term is generally more affordable, although it still requires a considerable investment.
Programme costs vary depending on destination, school type and accommodation, but a single term abroad typically starts at around €10,000 to €13,000. In many cases, fees can rise to €15,000 or more, particularly for private schools or placements in countries such as the United Kingdom or the United States.
These costs generally include tuition, accommodation, often with a host family, and local support services. However, additional expenses such as flights, insurance and personal spending are usually not included, increasing the overall cost.
By comparison, a full academic year abroad can exceed €25,000 to €35,000, which is one of the reasons shorter stays are becoming more attractive to families seeking a balance between cost and immersion.
Focus on English proficiency
The emphasis on English reflects its continued importance in education and employment. While Spain has made efforts to strengthen language teaching in schools, some families believe that time spent abroad offers a level of fluency that is difficult to achieve in the classroom alone.
Organisations such as ASEPROCE report that the vast majority of students who take part in international programmes do so with the primary aim of improving their English. The experience is also linked to greater confidence in communication, which can be valuable in both academic and professional settings.
A growing but measured trend
Although interest in term-length stays is increasing, it remains a considered decision rather than a widespread expectation. Not all students are suited to studying abroad, and families continue to weigh the advantages against the potential challenges.
Schools in Spain also play a role in guiding these choices, often advising on how time abroad can fit within a student’s overall education. In some cases, agreements between institutions help ensure that coursework completed overseas is recognised on return.
Looking ahead
The rise in shorter study programmes suggests a gradual shift in how families approach language learning. Rather than committing to a full year abroad, many are opting for a more flexible model that allows students to gain international experience without stepping entirely outside the Spanish education system.
As demand continues, providers are likely to expand the range of options available, offering different durations and destinations to suit varying needs. For now, the term abroad has established itself as a practical alternative, reflecting both the importance placed on English and the realities faced by modern families.