Un dron submarino usado por el narco, que parece un coche flotante en miniatura, fue recuperado el pasado sábado en las aguas del Estrecho mientras se encontraba a la deriva. Una embarcación de Salvamento Marítimo avistó el artefacto, de apariencia artesanal, y la Guardia Civil envió una patrullera a la zona. El ingenioso objeto del narco, de color oscuro y baja altura, no tenía ningún tipo de estupefaciente en su interior, aunque se presume que era utilizado para el transporte de drogas, según coinciden varias fuentes. Los agentes de Policía Judicial Civil de Algeciras (Cádiz) se encargarán de investigarlo.

El dron tenía el tamaño de una moto náutica, era de fabricación casera y se calcula que podría trasladar unos 200 kilos de sustancia estupefaciente, según las mismas fuentes. Con una base rectangular y bordes redondeados, estaba parcialmente sumergido, con el borde muy cercano al agua. Sus dimensiones aproximadas rondan los 2,5 metros de largo y 1,25 de ancho.

No es la primera vez que se habla de estos dispositivos en la costa gaditana. En 2022, la Policía desmanteló una organización que contó con la colaboración de un padre y un hijo que utilizaron unas naves de Castellar de la Frontera (Cádiz, 3.000 habitantes) para fabricar objetos donde esconder droga. Entre ellas había tres minisubmarinos no tripulados, preparados para cargar hasta 200 kilos de droga. Uno de esos diseños, a medio camino entre lo artesano y lo sofisticado, llegó a exponerse en el patio de la Comisaría de la Policía Nacional en Algeciras.

El dron del narco localizado la semana pasada también parece mezclar la última tecnología con acabados sencillos, incluso algo toscos. Según las imágenes del aparato, a las que ha tenido acceso EL PAÍS, en la parte superior tiene un bloque rectangular elevado con una placa blanca que, por su colocación y características, podría ser una antena GPS de alta precisión. También se aprecian en el casco antenas, con forma de varilla, y una cúpula semiesférica transparente que podría proteger una antena o un sensor.

En el interior, el dron tenía un compartimento electrónico protegido con varios elementos conectados con cableado. El aparato tenía instalado un módulo rectangular con la inscripción CAN PMU, una unidad de energía que se utiliza para vehículos no tripulados como los drones. Sus cables estaban guiados y también tenía restos de cinta, adhesivo o sellante blanco y un conector de tipo USB.

Los intentos del crimen organizado por introducir droga en el territorio nacional no cesan, tanto en vehículos no tripulados como en lanchas neumáticas. Este mismo jueves ha trascendido un vídeo que recoge una persecución en la que la Guardia Civil detuvo una narcolancha a 42 millas de la localidad de Punta Umbría (Huelva), cargada con 4.000 kilos de hachís. Sus cuatro tripulantes han sido arrestados.

Los agentes detectaron que la embarcación no llevaba sistemas de navegación y, cuando estaban cerca, vieron que era una embarcación semirrígida de cuatro motores cargada de fardos de arpillera. Al percatarse de que los habían descubierto, la narcolancha intentó huir y se produjo una persecución, en la que pusieron en riesgo su vida y la de los agentes. Durante la fuga, arrojaron algunos fardos al agua y garrafas de combustible.

A cinema chain in Algeciras has been fined €45,000 for preventing customers from entering screening rooms with food and drink bought outside the venue, according to reports published on Monday. The sanction was imposed on Yelmo Cines by the Territorial Delegation of Health and Consumer Affairs of the Junta de Andalucía in Cádiz after complaints supported by consumer organisation FACUA. The case concerns the company’s policy of restricting access to customers carrying products purchased elsewhere.

According to the published resolution, the offence was classified as serious under Andalucían consumer protection rules. In the region, serious infringements can carry financial penalties ranging from €10,001 to €100,000.

Basis of the complaint

The dispute centres on whether a cinema whose principal activity is film exhibition can stop customers bringing in food and drink from outside when ticket holders have already paid for entry.

Consumer groups have argued that cinemas are not primarily food businesses and therefore cannot automatically require visitors to buy refreshments on site as a condition of access. They say blanket bans on outside items may place unfair limits on consumer choice. FACUA said it had backed complaints against the practice in several parts of Spain, arguing that customers should be free to decide where they buy snacks and drinks unless there are specific safety or hygiene grounds that justify restrictions.

Previous sanctions

Reports state this is the fourth penalty issued against the Yelmo cine chain over the same issue. Earlier fines cited in coverage include €25,000 in Almería, €12,000 in Sevilla, and €30,000 imposed by the Basque consumer authority Kontsumobide. Those cases also related to restrictions on customers carrying food or drink purchased outside the cinema.

The latest sanction in Algeciras is the highest of the reported fines linked to the practice.

Consumer law background

Spanish consumer law allows regional authorities to investigate business practices and issue penalties where rules are found to have been breached. Enforcement is handled by autonomous communities, meaning cases are decided by regional bodies rather than a single national regulator.

The Algeciras case was handled by the Andalucian administration through its provincial consumer authority in Cádiz. The classification of the offence as serious indicates the authority considered the conduct to go beyond a minor administrative issue, although the published reports do not detail whether aggravating factors were taken into account when setting the amount.

Position of cinemas

Most cinemas sell food and drink as an additional source of income, with popcorn, sweets and beverages forming part of their commercial offer. Some venues have rules limiting what can be taken into screening rooms, particularly where alcohol, hot food or glass containers are concerned. The issue in this case, however, concerns a general ban on products bought elsewhere rather than restrictions linked to safety or disturbance.

No wider industry response had been reported at the time of publication regarding whether operators would review admission policies following the latest fine.

Wider significance

The decision is likely to attract attention beyond Algeciras because similar policies are common in cinemas in Spain and other countries. The case may encourage further complaints from customers or prompt other regional authorities to review existing rules where bans are in place.

It also highlights the role of consumer organisations in bringing complaints that lead to regulatory action. FACUA has previously campaigned on pricing, contract terms and access conditions across several sectors.

What happens next

It was not immediately clear from published reports whether the fine would be appealed. Companies subject to administrative sanctions in Spain can usually challenge decisions through internal procedures and, if necessary, through the courts. Unless overturned or reduced, the penalty adds to a growing number of sanctions issued over the same practice.

For cinema-goers, the ruling does not automatically create a nationwide rule applying to every venue, as enforcement decisions are taken case by case and under regional powers. However, it reinforces the view of several consumer authorities that blanket bans on outside food and drink may breach consumer protection rules when the main service being sold is admission to watch a film. The case is one of the clearest recent examples of regulators intervening in cinema admission policies and may shape how operators approach food and drink rules in future.