Connect with us

Donald Trump

Death Of Young Haitian Migrant Highlights Psychological Harm Of ICE’s Ankle Monitors

Published

on

death-of-young-haitian-migrant-highlights-psychological-harm-of-ice’s-ankle-monitors

This coming Friday the residents of Springfield, Ohio, are being called to a vigil to remember Pierre Damas Bel, a 20-year-old Haitian man whom his family says died by suicide on Monday after walking onto Interstate 70, where a tractor-trailer struck him, killing him instantaneously. The incident, which Ohio Governor Mike DeWine called “a horrible, horrible tragedy,” has shocked the country.

There is no way to know for certain the reasons that led him to take such a decision, but his family, friends and his own statements point in the same direction: the Trump administration’s inhumane immigration policy. Bel’s behavior changed after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) fitted him with an electronic ankle monitor to track his movements by GPS, which led to harassment from his peers.

“After they put this ankle monitor on my son, he felt he was treated like an animal,” his father, Pierres Ronal Bel, 40, said in a statement read by Pastor Carl Ruby of the Central Christian Church.

The young man also described the dire situation he was living through and the emotional distress the device was causing him. “I came to this country to pursue my education. I didn’t come here to commit a crime or hurt anyone. Yet now I’m walking through the streets of the United States with a GPS monitor on my leg, carrying a feeling of shame and humiliation that I never imagined I would experience,” he posted on his Instagram account in July along with a photo of his leg with the ankle monitor.

Bel’s death has highlighted the consequences of wearing a device that causes physical pain, social marginalization and psychological disorders. “These devices cause really significant harm to mental health. People report a marked deterioration in their quality of life and in their desire to go out, socialize and do activities they once enjoyed,” Lauren Hodges, senior attorney at Amica, told EL PAÍS. The migrant-rights advocacy organization filed a lawsuit in June against the Trump administration over the indiscriminate use of GPS monitors. At the time of the lawsuit, about 50,000 people were wearing the device.

“People perceive a strong stigma in the community; there is an idea that wearing these devices means you have done something wrong or committed a crime. Many of the people we spoke to work and care for children; they are individuals who, before having to wear these monitors, enjoyed going to church and spending time with friends. Now they feel the community sees them differently, which makes them avoid going out in public and prevents them from living a normal life,” she explains.

The use of this tool is not new; previous administrations had already used it. The difference since Trump returned to the White House and launched his crusade against immigration is that ICE no longer evaluates each case individually. According to officials, the tool’s function is to force undocumented people to attend their immigration appointments, but critics consider it unnecessary and an assault on liberty to have a person located 24 hours a day. Whereas previously monitors were reserved for specific cases studied individually, the immigration agency now uses them indiscriminately. Bel, an exemplary student who was following asylum procedures, is an example of that.

Bel was the eldest of three siblings, and his family describes him as intelligent and responsible. He arrived in the United States in 2024, fleeing violence in Haiti, to join family members who had entered two years earlier. He had an asylum application in process. He graduated with honors from high school, was a standout athlete and was a member of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC). Bel had recently begun his first semester at Wright State University in Dayton on a scholarship, and his dream was to study medicine.

His father said everything was fine until they put on the ankle monitor and his son’s life changed. Bel made two separate visits to ICE offices to beg agents to remove the device because it interfered with his athletic activity and caused him deep shame in front of his peers. The young man complained to his father that last Friday his JROTC instructor distributed uniforms to students but did not give him one because he was wearing the ankle monitor.

In his statement, Pierres Ronal Bel said that on the day of the tragic outcome his son messaged him. “He said, ‘Dad, I’m not feeling ok. I’m not thinking right … because of the bullies,’ and I told him, ‘Come home so that we can talk […] Around 11 the police showed at my door to report that my son threw himself under a truck.”

Participants in Amica’s class-action lawsuit also point to the physical harm of wearing the ankle monitors, which are heavy, painful and heat up. In some cases people have suffered infections and, in general, they make walking, bending and everyday tasks difficult. But the psychological harm is even greater, especially for people who carry traumas — “particularly those seeking asylum or who have survived human trafficking or domestic violence. Electronic shackles are a real reminder of that trauma; they make people feel watched and controlled, and have a truly terrible effect on them,” Hodges adds.

ICE did not respond to EL PAÍS’s questions about Bel’s death, but in a statement said, “ICE does not comment on cause of death while the investigation is ongoing, and we will not speculate on unverified claims regarding other people. No one is required to remain in the United States illegally. Undocumented immigrants have a legal, voluntary option: they can self-deport.”

First blow, the end of TPS

Trump’s immigration policy had already struck Bel’s family by terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians, a decision the Supreme Court upheld in June. The young man was one of hundreds of Haitians summoned by ICE after the program that allowed them to live and work legally in the United States was ended.

The termination of TPS, granted to nationals of countries facing emergency situations such as violence, natural disasters or war, is part of Trump’s deportation campaign. The circumstances that drove the roughly 350,000 Haitians affected to flee their country and seek refuge in the United States, however, have not changed. Haiti remains dominated by criminal gangs and widespread violence, so despite no longer having TPS, returning to their country is not an option for most.

“A couple of weeks ago I was accompanying a man to his ICE appointment when he told me, ‘Some gangs just kidnapped my brother in Haiti.’ I asked how he was, and he replied that they had burned him alive. These are not unusual stories; I hear them again and again. That is why they feel absolute terror at the idea of returning to Haiti,” Pastor Ruby told CNN. Ruby described the harassment the Haitian community in Springfield has suffered from the government since Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance made false and outlandish accusations that the Haitians in Springfield (about 10,000 of a population of 60,000) were eating people’s pets.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Ataque Estados Unidos a Venezuela

La Eterna Espera De Los Damnificados En Venezuela Que Viven En Refugios Y Albergues Desde Hace Más De 15 Años

Published

on

Refugio 'La Posada de Catia' en Caracas, Venezuela, el 10 de agosto.

Hace unos años que Magdalena compró una vajilla que soñaba estrenar en la vivienda que pudiera otorgarle el Estado después de haberse quedado sin casa en 2012, cuando se deslizó la tierra en Catia, al oeste de Caracas, a causa de las lluvias, y su hogar se derrumbó junto con los de otras 60 familias. En ese momento fue a parar a un edificio abandonado de la avenida José Ángel Lamas, que ya era refugio de otras familias damnificadas. Algunas de ellas accedieron a una vivienda —incluso en La Guaira, que volvieron a perder después del terremoto—, pero Magdalena nunca pudo salir de ahí. En 2025, después de 13 años, murió en la espera, con su caja de platos aún sin estrenar.

Seguir leyendo

Moraima Afanador en el refugio José Ángel Lamas de Caracas, el 10 de agosto.Yeiker García, tiende su ropa para secarla en el patio del refugio La Posada de Catia.Niños juegan en el refugio La Posada de Catia,en Caracas.Yarceli Diaz abraza a su hijo en el espacio que le asignaron en la Torre Pomarrosa, en Caracas,e l 10 de agosto.







Continue Reading

America

Arrestado Un Creador De Contenido De Los Ángeles Acusado De Pedir En Las Redes Sociales Que Asesinaran A Trump

Published

on

arrestado-un-creador-de-contenido-de-los-angeles-acusado-de-pedir-en-las-redes-sociales-que-asesinaran-a-trump

Un creador de contenido que presuntamente amenazó de muerte en reiteradas ocasiones al presidente Donald Trump fue arrestado este jueves en su casa de Los Ángeles, California. El sospechoso habría instado a sus seguidores, a través de distintas redes sociales y de sus canales de YouTube, a asesinar al mandatario, al considerar que su Gobierno “es ilegítimo y está fuera de control”. Según una acusación penal, el acoso cibernético también estuvo dirigido contra uno de los abogados personales del republicano y el hijo de este.

Seguir leyendo

Continue Reading

America

Judge Blocks Trump’s New Attempt To Limit Birthright Citizenship In The US

Published

on

judge-blocks-trump’s-new-attempt-to-limit-birthright-citizenship-in-the-us

Donald Trump’s latest effort to limit the right to birthright citizenship has been blocked. A federal judge in Maryland has temporarily halted the administration’s new attempt to deny U.S. citizenship to a group of children whose parents are in the country temporarily or unlawfully, finding that the executive order likely conflicts with a recent Supreme Court decision recognizing that those children are U.S. citizens.

Judge Deborah L. Boardman of the U.S. District Court in Maryland issued a preliminary order Wednesday barring the government from enforcing the executive order Trump signed on August 6. The measure bars several federal agencies, including the State and Homeland Security departments and the Social Security Administration, from taking any action to deny, interfere with or fail to recognize the citizenship of the children covered by the lawsuit.

The ruling represents another setback for Trump after the Supreme Court rejected his first attempt in June to end automatic citizenship for children of people who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

The dispute centers on the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, whose Citizenship Clause establishes that all people born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens. In June, the Supreme Court ruled by a 6-3 vote that the children covered by the class action affected by Trump’s first order were U.S. citizens at birth.

Boardman found that the ruling had already settled the issue for the children protected by her order. “No presidential executive order can undo [what the Supreme Court has done],” she wrote, adding that the high court’s decision is “the law of the land.”

Trump’s new order is narrower than the one that triggered the previous legal battle, but it introduces several categories under which certain children could be excluded from citizenship. They include children of people classified as “alien enemies,” a category the administration has applied to alleged members of transnational criminal organizations, as well as children of foreign government employees in the United States.

The order also seeks to deny citizenship in cases involving so-called “birth tourism,” in which a woman is considered to have traveled to the country to give birth with the intention of having her child automatically obtain U.S. citizenship. The decree also mentions situations involving fraud or a “commercial transaction” related to obtaining citizenship.

That wording raised questions about how broadly the measure could be applied. Boardman noted that the decree could be interpreted broadly enough to affect even people who purchased an airline ticket to travel to the United States. She also warned about the risk that the administration could deny citizenship to children based on allegations against their parents.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs, including the CASA and Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project groups, argued that historically accepted exceptions to birthright citizenship are very limited and accused the government of attempting to expand them through an executive order.

The Justice Department defended a different interpretation. Its lawyers argued that the Supreme Court’s decision did not establish that all children born to noncitizen parents are citizens without exception, and pointed out that historical categories, such as children of diplomats and certain “alien enemies,” are not covered by the guarantee.

They also argued that the lawsuit was premature because federal agencies had not yet issued the guidance needed to implement the decree. However, Boardman found that intervention was necessary before those guidelines took effect.

The judge clarified that the agencies may still develop guidance on how the government intends to implement the order, but they cannot use it to deny citizenship to the children protected by her ruling.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Spanish Real Estate Agents

Tags

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News