Connect with us

%

DIA Frozen Seafood Warning With Undeclared Egg

Published

on

dia-frozen-seafood-warning-with-undeclared-egg

Frozen food product alert. Credit: AESAN

Shoppers across Spain are being encouraged to check their freezers after the country’s food safety agency issued a nationwide warning over a frozen seafood product sold by supermarket chain DIA.

The alert concerns eight batches of MeloDIA marinera con gambas al ajillo, a frozen seafood preparation sold under the DIA Mari Marinera brand. The 250g plastic tray contains two 125g portions, and the product was distributed across Spain.

Spain’s Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition (AESAN) published the warning on Wednesday, October 28, after being notified that the product contains egg that is not declared on its packaging. Read the official AESAN food safety warning.

The warning is specifically directed at people with an egg allergy, who are being told not to eat the affected product if they have it at home. AESAN has stressed that consuming the product does not pose a risk to the rest of the population in relation to this alert.

Which DIA frozen seafood batches are affected?

Consumers who have bought the product should check the batch code and expiry date printed on the packaging.

The eight affected batches are:

  • L260566GGO – November 30, 2027
  • L260642GGO – December 31, 2027
  • L260747GGO – January 31, 2028
  • L260754GGO – January 31, 2028
  • L260769GGO – January 31, 2028
  • L260942GGO – March 31, 2028
  • L260951GGO – March 31, 2028
  • L260962GGO – March 31, 2028

The warning follows information supplied through Spain’s coordinated food safety alert system after the company reported the labelling problem to the authorities. AESAN has passed the information to the relevant authorities so they can verify that affected products have been withdrawn from sale.

Anyone who is unsure whether their product is affected should check the batch details carefully and contact the retailer for guidance. Consumers can also consult AESAN’s official food safety alerts page for other warnings affecting products sold in Spain.

Why undeclared egg can be dangerous

Egg is a recognised food allergen, and people with an egg allergy can experience reactions after eating a product containing it. Symptoms can range from skin reactions and digestive problems to breathing difficulties. In severe cases, food allergies can cause anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening reaction requiring emergency treatment.

The issue is that shoppers who rely on ingredient labels to avoid allergens may have no reason to expect egg in a product whose packaging does not declare its presence. The European Commission explains which allergens must be declared on food labels and why accurate labelling matters.

People with an egg allergy should not consume any of the identified batches, even if the product looks and smells normal.

Malaga food poisoning cases put food safety in focus

It seems that Spanish prawn dishes are not the flavour of the month. The warning comes after two separate food poisoning incidents affected wedding celebrations in Malaga province during October. Around 40 people fell ill after a wedding reception at the Estival Torrequebrada hotel in Benalmadena on October 10. Health authorities subsequently confirmed salmonella as the cause. Read our report on the food poisoning outbreak affecting wedding guests at a Benalmadena hotel.

A second outbreak was reported following a wedding celebration in Iznate, in the Axarquia, where around 40 people developed symptoms. Initial tests detected salmonella in an affected person, while investigations continued to establish the source. One guest was admitted to intensive care. Our follow-up report covers the two Malaga wedding food poisoning outbreaks under investigation.

There is no reported connection between those incidents and the DIA seafood warning. The distinction is important: the latest alert concerns an undeclared allergen, whereas the wedding outbreaks involved suspected foodborne infections. But, all three incidences involved prawns.

For consumers, the practical message is to check official food safety warnings, pay attention to product labels and take any suspected allergic reaction or foodborne illness seriously.

%

Would You Feel Safe On Spain’s Trains? Transport Minister Insists They Are Safe

Published

on

would-you-feel-safe-on-spain’s-trains?-transport-minister-insists-they-are-safe

By Nazario Rodriguez • Updated: 30 Oct 2026 • 21:01 • 3 minutes read

Spain high-speed train crash: Two carriages plunge down embankment as emergency crews rush to scene

Eyewitness described a desperate effort to rescue passengers Credit: Rafa Martín FB (passenger)

An unfinished safety upgrade, repeated outages and criticism of the minister’s response have left the Government facing questions that passengers deserve to see answered.

If you travel by train in Spain, the deadly collision near Toledo raises a question that affects every journey. What protects you when a safety system fails? With an overdue upgrade still unfinished and earlier faults already reported, passengers deserve to know why the remaining safeguards did not prevent the crash and what will change to keep them safe.

The collision between a Renfe AVE and an Iryo train near Urda killed 69 people. Investigators must establish exactly what happened. The Government must also explain the decisions, delays and arrangements that preceded it.

A safety upgrade remained unfinished

Adif awarded a €93.8 million contract in 2021 to replace the LZB train control system on the Madrid to Andalucía line with ERTMS. The project had a 52 month schedule, with completion expected in 2026.

The replacement was still not operational when the collision happened. Transport Minister Óscar Puente now says it is expected to enter service in early 2027, attributing the delay to the complexity of installing equipment while keeping trains running.

Earlier problems had also been raised. Three weeks before the crash, Iryo’s chief executive told a Senate committee that drivers had experienced trains stopping and taking time to reconnect after LZB faults.

These details do not establish that the delayed upgrade caused the collision. They do require an explanation of how the risks were assessed while the existing system remained in service.

A reliable system with 160 outages

During the transports minister’s appearance on Friday morning, he defended LZB as highly reliable while acknowledging 160 outages during 2026 so far.

According to 20minutos, the minister said 75 per cent involved external circumstances, including maintenance and track works. His argument was that the system responded correctly by stopping trains.

That distinction matters. An outage does not automatically mean the system failed to protect passengers. But repeated interruptions make the procedures used afterwards particularly important. If outages are expected, the arrangements for managing them must reliably keep trains apart.

In January, EWN questioned how repeated disruption had become normal on Spain’s railways. The Toledo disaster gives that concern a far more serious dimension.

Why did safety depend on a human decision?

We live in a world where passengers can follow an aircraft’s journey across continents on a phone. Trains also have tracking and signalling systems, making the circumstances of this collision difficult to comprehend. How could one train be authorised to continue towards another stopped on the same track?

Tracking a vehicle and automatically preventing a collision are different functions. Nevertheless, passengers deserve to understand why the information and safeguards available did not keep these trains apart.

Puente said that when technology fails, people must take over. He announced that protocols, training, staffing and the verification of decisions would be examined.

His explanation left a crucial question unresolved. When automatic safeguards become unavailable, what protects passengers if the person managing the situation makes the wrong decision?

Investigators must establish which protections remained available at Urda and how they were used. Saying that staff must take over does not explain why the remaining procedures failed to prevent the collision.

The transport minister’s response and the Ministry’s record

Puente’s first appearance after the crash drew strong criticism for focusing on an apparently mistaken instruction from Adif’s control room before investigators had established the full circumstances. Railway unions accused him of singling out a worker while wider questions remained unanswered.

On Friday, he ruled out resigning and promised not to use any worker as a shield. Identifying an operational mistake would not, by itself, settle questions about the delayed upgrade, maintenance, staffing or supervision.

The Ministry also faces a public trust problem shaped by the record of former minister José Luis Ábalos. In October, the Supreme Court rejected attempts by Ábalos and his former adviser Koldo García to overturn their corruption convictions. The offences included bribery and the misuse of public funds. The judgment also addressed jobs obtained for associates in public companies, as EFE’s reporting details.

Those convictions do not establish a connection with the collision. But they add another layer to concerns about a ministry where delays, faults and scandals risk becoming accepted as normal. Each requires its own answers. Together, they make assurances alone insufficient to restore public trust.

The Government must explain why the upgrade was delayed, how earlier faults were handled and whether the protections maintained during that delay were adequate.

Passengers should not have to choose between trusting technology and trusting that a worker will never make a mistake. They deserve a system designed to protect them when either fails, and ministers willing to answer for how that protection is delivered.

Google News

Follow Euro Weekly News on Google News

Get breaking news from Spain, travel updates, and expat stories directly on your Google News feed.

Follow on Google News

Sign up for personalised news

Subscribe to our Euro Weekly News alerts to get the latest stories into your inbox!

By signing up, you will create a Euro Weekly News account if you don’t already have one. Review our Privacy Policy for more information about our privacy practices.

Continue Reading

%

Sardinian Screen Free Families Dinner

Published

on

sardinian-screen-free-families-dinner

Fifteen restaurants in Sardinia are encouraging families to put their phones away at mealtimes, using games and activities to help parents and children reconnect without digital distractions.

Scrolling while you eat

Smartphones are now a regular presence at many family dinners, but a new initiative in Sardinia hopes to get people talking again. Participating restaurants are inviting parents and children to put their devices aside and enjoy a meal without constantly checking screens.

The scheme, called A tavola senza schermi (‘At the table without screens’), is a one-month pilot involving 15 restaurants, who volunteered to take part, across the Italian island due to begin in early November.

Why Sardinian restaurants want families to put phones away

The initiative was launched by Sardinia’s children’s and adolescents’ ombudsman, Anna Cau, in collaboration with Fipe Confcommercio Sardegna. Its aim is to encourage face-to-face communication and address concerns about excessive screen use among children.

According to The Guardian’s report, organisers want to make it easier for families to spend mealtimes talking rather than concentrating on their devices.

Emanuele Frongia, president of Fipe Confcommercio Sardegna, has raised concerns about conversations being replaced by silence when diners focus on their phones. Children may also be given devices to keep them occupied while adults eat.

Rather than introducing a compulsory ban, the project encourages parents to lead by example and agree to put their own phones away, too.

Games and activities replace screen time

Participating restaurants will offer families a ‘Kit del Ritrovo’, or ‘Reunion Kit’, developed with input from Italy’s federation of paediatricians.

The kit includes games, drawing activities and age-appropriate ideas to keep children occupied while waiting for their food. Families will also receive information about digital exposure and advice on managing children’s and teenagers’ technology use at home.

The activities are intended to make the experience enjoyable rather than restrictive. Phones are put away during the meal, with families encouraged to agree on exceptions beforehand. Urgent calls should be taken away from the table.

Which restaurants in Sardinia are taking part?

The participating restaurants are spread across several parts of the island, including Cagliari, Nuoro, Bari Sardo, Alghero, Olbia and Porto Rotondo.

Named participants include Antica Cagliari and Pani e Casu in Cagliari, Pappas Experience in Nuoro, I Tre Mori da Mario in Bari Sardo, Risto Fever in Alghero, Ristorante Terranostra in Olbia and La Rosa dei Venti in Porto Rotondo. Other venues are located in areas including Capoterra, Ussassai and Santa Teresa Gallura.

Organisers initially planned to involve eight restaurants, but the number grew to 15 as more businesses volunteered. The trial will help assess whether the initiative could be extended.

How Sardinia’s scheme differs from Italy’s luxury phone-free restaurant

The family-focused project comes as other Italian dining venues introduce their own restrictions on mobile phones.

Yera, a restaurant at the Forestis hotel in South Tyrol, has attracted attention for its €650-per-person dining experience, which requires guests to leave their phones and cameras in lockers, as reported here in EWN. 

However, Sardinia’s initiative has a different purpose: encouraging healthier digital habits and better family interaction rather than making a phone-free meal part of an exclusive luxury experience.

Could screen-free family meals catch on?

For some parents, an hour without checking notifications may not be a big deal. For others, changing an established habit could prove more difficult. Sardinia’s trial gives families a wholesome way to try a different approach, with activities for children and guidance for parents.

Continue Reading

%

Motorhome Owners Plan New Protests In Elche

Published

on

motorhome-owners-plan-new-protests-in-elche

Motorhome parking restrictions. Credit: Tunatura / Shutterstock.com.

Motorhome owners are preparing to intensify their campaign against parking restrictions in Elche and Santa Pola following changes to Spain’s traffic regulations. Campaigners say the new rules strengthen their argument that legally parked motorhomes should not automatically be considered to be camping, with another demonstration in Elche now planned before the end of the year.

New traffic rules cover motorhome parking

Motorhome owners are preparing to step up their battle against parking restrictions in Elche and Santa Pola following changes to Spain’s traffic regulations.

The new rules, which came into force on October 1, set specific conditions for parking motorhomes and other vehicles adapted for accommodation. Owners argue the change strengthens their case that legally parked motorhomes should not automatically be treated as camping.

Under the regulations, nothing can extend beyond the vehicle; it must remain supported on its tyres, although safety chocks are permitted, and no fluids can be discharged from the living area.

Coastal parking restrictions cause controversy

The issue has caused particular controversy around coastal areas including Santa Pola’s Cabo and parking areas near Elche’s beaches, where motorhome users claim restrictions unfairly single them out.

Campaigners argue that vans and other large vehicles can use some parking areas while motorhomes face restrictions simply because they contain living accommodation.

The debate centres on the distinction between parking a vehicle and using the surrounding public space for camping activities.

Third Elche demonstration planned this year

Motorhome group Helgober is now planning a third demonstration in Elche before the end of the year, following two protests in 2025.

Organisers hope to attract drivers from across Spain and are also considering legal action against councils over restrictions they believe are unjustified.

The planned demonstration would bring the parking dispute back into the spotlight as campaigners continue to challenge the way restrictions are applied to motorhomes.

Campaigners call for action against offenders

Campaigners acknowledge problems such as illegal waste disposal and putting out furniture, but say individual offenders should be dealt with rather than imposing restrictions on all motorhome owners.

They argue that owners who comply with the rules should be able to park without automatically being treated as campers, and are preparing to continue their campaign in Elche before the end of 2026.

Sign up for personalised news

Subscribe to our Euro Weekly News alerts to get the latest stories into your inbox!

By signing up, you will create a Euro Weekly News account if you don’t already have one. Review our Privacy Policy for more information about our privacy practices.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News