Connect with us

America

An Appeals Court Upholds The Injunction Blocking Trump’s Order That Sought To Restrict Mail-In Voting In 23 States

Published

on

an-appeals-court-upholds-the-injunction-blocking-trump’s-order-that-sought-to-restrict-mail-in-voting-in-23-states

With just over three months to go before the November congressional elections in the United States, a federal appeals court has upheld the injunction blocking one of President Donald Trump’s key measures to change the administration of mail-in voting. The decision prevents the government, for now, from imposing new restrictions in the 23 states and the District of Columbia that challenged the executive order in court.

The ruling was issued Sunday by the Boston-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which rejected the administration’s request to lift an injunction that suspended the measure’s implementation while the litigation continues. The ruling protects the plaintiff states from the changes planned for the midterm elections on November 3.

The executive order, signed by Trump in March, directs the director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the commissioner of the Social Security Administration to compile a federal list of citizens eligible to vote. It also stipulates that the U.S. Postal Service deliver mail-in ballots only to individuals included in that registry.

The president defended the initiative as a tool to prevent non-U.S. citizens from participating in elections and argued that it was necessary to strengthen election security. “The cheating on mail-in voting is legendary,” Trump said in the Oval Office before signing the executive order.

However, state election officials and Democratic attorneys general argue that the measure exceeds the federal executive branch’s authority and could disrupt the organization of the elections by imposing new requirements just weeks before the vote.

In a 2-1 split decision, the majority of the First Circuit panel concluded that the executive order represents an unprecedented level of federal involvement in the administration of state elections. The judges noted that, if implemented before the November election, the new rules could cause confusion among voters and affect the access of eligible voters.

The justices also noted that the Constitution assigns to the states the primary responsibility for administering federal elections, an argument that was also central to the lawsuit filed by the states.

The legal dispute began after Democratic officials from 23 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit on April 3 in a federal court in Boston. The plaintiffs argue that the president lacks the authority to unilaterally change election rules, as that power belongs to Congress and the states themselves.

In June, Federal Judge Indira Talwani granted a preliminary injunction that blocked the enforcement of the executive order in the states that filed the lawsuit. The administration appealed that decision, but the appeals court ruled to uphold the injunction while the case proceeds.

However, the ruling does not definitively resolve the dispute, nor does it have nationwide scope. The decision only protects the states that participated in the lawsuit, so there is still uncertainty regarding the possible enforcement of the restrictions in other states that are not part of the litigation.

This situation contrasts with a ruling issued last week by another federal appeals court, which overturned a separate injunction that had blocked the measure’s implementation on a broader scale. As a result, the legal landscape remains fragmented and could lead to different rules depending on the state where the elections are held.

Meanwhile, the Department of Justice stated that it is reviewing all available options and expressed confidence that the executive order will ultimately be upheld by the courts.

The possibility that the case will reach the Supreme Court remains open, especially given the differences between the rulings issued by various federal courts regarding the scope of the injunctions.

All of this is taking place amid the debate over mail-in voting, a system widely used in many states and whose security has been questioned by Trump for several years. The president has repeatedly argued that this method facilitates voter fraud, although various investigations and reviews of past elections have found few instances of irregularities.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

America

María Corina Machado Asegura Que No Participa En Las Reuniones Impulsadas Por Estados Unidos Entre Oposición Y Chavismo

Published

on

María Corina Machado, líder de la oposición en Venezuela, en Washington.

María Corina Machado ha hecho una reaparición en redes sociales este domingo para enviar un mensaje a todos los venezolanos. La opositora en el exilio ha asegurado que no participa en las reuniones impulsadas por la Administración del presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, entre el bloque opositor y los representantes del chavismo. Sin embargo, promete no ser “un obstáculo” a ninguna iniciativa que produzca avances en la liberación de presos políticos, el retorno de los exiliados y un calendario electoral futuro.

Seguir leyendo

Continue Reading

America

Flávio Bolsonaro Se Lanza A La Carrera Presidencial De Brasil Con Pocas Alianzas Y En El Punto De Mira De La Justicia

Published

on

flavio-bolsonaro-se-lanza-a-la-carrera-presidencial-de-brasil-con-pocas-alianzas-y-en-el-punto-de-mira-de-la-justicia

El hijo mayor del expresidente brasileño Jair Bolsonaro, el senador Flávio Bolsonaro, de 45 años, ya es oficialmente candidato a la presidencia de Brasil. Mientras su padre sigue en su casa de Brasilia en arresto domiciliario cumpliendo una pena de 27 años de cárcel, el Partido Liberal, el principal contenedor de la extrema derecha brasileña, le nombró candidato presidencial en un acto multitudinario en São Paulo, que contó con la presencia del presidente argentino, Javier Milei. Flávio Bolsonaro llega a la carrera para los comicios de octubre aislado políticamente, acorralado por la justicia y superado por el presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva en las encuestas, pero a pesar de numerosos contratiempos, su candidatura no se ha deshidratado, como pronosticaban algunos.

Seguir leyendo

Continue Reading

America

Venezuela’s Deadly Earthquakes Stress The Urgency To Redesignate TPS

Published

on

venezuela’s-deadly-earthquakes-stress-the-urgency-to-redesignate-tps

In 2021, bipartisan efforts led to the initial designation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuela. It was clear then, as it is today, that it is not safe for Venezuelans to return to a country embattled by political instability, famine, violence, and now, widespread devastation from the strongest earthquakes to hit the nation in over a century.

We are calling on President Donald Trump to do the right thing by authorizing Deferred Enforced Departure or redesignating Temporary Protected Status to ensure thousands of Venezuelans can remain with their families and continue to contribute meaningfully to our communities.

For the more than 17,000 Venezuelan New Yorkers who have strong ties to the region, this tragedy hits home.

As news of the devastation spread, New Yorkers jumped into action. Within hours, Ivo Diaz, the owner of Lulla in Williamsburg, transformed his restaurant into a donation hub and mobilized volunteers to pack food, medicine, and supplies. Hispanic Federation also launched Ayuda a los Pueblos: Venezuela Disaster Relief to support Aid for Life, a New York-based group working with people on the ground to procure supplies needed for critical recovery efforts.

These volunteers are among the many New Yorkers who have metabolized their grief into action while awaiting news of their parents, children, siblings, and loved ones to know whether they are alive among the rubble.

Since the earthquakes struck one month ago, thousands of people have been declared dead, while tens of thousands of people remain missing.

Un voluntario hace la señal de silencio durante las labores de rescate en el complejo OPP 26 de Tanaguarena, Caraballeda, estado La Guaira (Venezuela)

Among them are 146 people who boarded a deportation flight and landed hours before the earthquakes hit the region. Families are still seeking answers as to whether their loved ones were on Flight 164 and if so, whether they made it to safety, bearing the unimaginable pain of loss twice in mere hours: once to deportation and now to fatal disaster.

Even before the earthquakes, Venezuela was already facing multiple, compounding crises. Years of political repression and economic collapse under Nicolas Maduro’s authoritarian government decimated food and water systems, public infrastructure, and pushed health care systems to the brink.

These dire conditions are what led to the forced migration of nearly eight million people — 25% of Venezuela’s population — since Maduro took office in 2013.

It is inhumane to force Venezuelan TPS holders, who have raised families here, built businesses, and become indispensable members of our communities, to return to a disaster zone where conditions are more dangerous now than those that prompted their initial departure. Our own State Department has issued travel warnings for Venezuela, discouraging people from visiting due to ongoing safety risks.

Temporary Protected Status exists for moments like these — to protect people who cannot safely return to their home countries. At a time when political uncertainty and natural disaster have put safety out of reach for millions of Venezuelans, the federal government must heed its own advice by stopping ongoing deportations and redesignating TPS for Venezuela.

Rescatistas y voluntarios buscan víctimas del terremoto entre los escombros de un edificio, en La Guaira

In New York City, two-thirds of all residents are first- or second-generation immigrants. Throughout history, generations of immigrants, including our own families, have come to the U.S. seeking safety, opportunity, and the chance to build a better future. In doing so, they have strengthened our economy and enriched our culture, shaping New York City into the global powerhouse it is today.

Altogether, TPS holders contribute $29 billion annually to the U.S. economy, with Venezuelan TPS holders alone responsible for an astounding $5.8 billion. They care for our loved ones, put food on our table, and build the roads that connect us.

Allowing TPS to end will only deepen workforce shortages, place additional strain on our healthcare system, and create instability for our families, employers, and communities.

Beyond the widespread labor and economic consequences for our country, our call to redesignate TPS is about securing dignity and humanity for all. Taking away work authorization and stable pathways to immigration forces people into the shadows and increases the risk of exploitation for already vulnerable populations.

We should be creating pathways to security for people who have contributed so much to our city and country, not forcing them into uncertainty and instability. President Trump must redesignate Temporary Protected Status or authorize Deferred Enforced Departure for Venezuelans.

We owe it to each other, and to ourselves, to live up to our values as a nation and ensure that immigrants — who are central to our history — can continue to help us write our future.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Spanish Real Estate Agents

Tags

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Spanish Property & News